On 05/15/2013 05:02 PM, Richard Shetron wrote:
> I'm having problems with DOMAIN not found errors. Is there anyway to
> edit/remove them from the qfiles/out .pck files? They don't seem to be
> getting purged by mailman and hang around way too long.
If the MTA (Postfix) is returning a 4xx status
I'm having problems with DOMAIN not found errors. Is there anyway to
edit/remove them from the qfiles/out .pck files? They don't seem to be
getting purged by mailman and hang around way too long.
I'm using postfix and mailman 2.1.12 under ubuntu 8.04.
I found item 4.20 in the FAQ, but I'm no
Mark Sapiro writes:
> On 05/15/2013 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, can I interpret your response as being that mailman always drops
>> Cc and there is no configuration option?
>
>
> I guess that depends on what you call a configuration option.
>
> You could put this in mm_cfg.py
>
> GL
On 05/15/2013 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> Anyway, can I interpret your response as being that mailman always drops
> Cc and there is no configuration option?
I guess that depends on what you call a configuration option.
You could put this in mm_cfg.py
GLOBAL_PIPELINE.remove('AvoidDuplicates
Mark Sapiro writes:
> The Message-ID of the post is in the HTML page containing the post, but
> it is only in an In-Reply-To= fragment of a mailto: URL that isn't
> indexed in htdig. Also, it's URL encoded so <, > and @ are %3C, %3E and
> %40 respectively. The actual Message-ID: headers are in th
On 05/14/2013 10:17 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> I would like to be able to search the archives of a mailman list using
> the Message-ID, ideally using a stable URL like
>
> http://mid.gmane.org/${message_id}
> http://mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=${message_id}
>
> but preferably on our own host
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 07:48 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
...
>> + the post is being deferred due to improper content
> The phrase "improper content" does not appear in any standard GNU
> Mailmamn hold reason. Either you are not reporting the actual reason o
On 05/15/2013 08:45 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> My question is can Mailman strip out the duplicate From: headers leaving
> the first one? I have searched for a Postfix solution with no luck. I
> guess I could work up a procmail solution for all inbound mail but really
> didn't want to add that lay
On 05/15/2013 07:48 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> However, I still get notices that my attention is required. When I
> look at the list I see, for each problem post:
>
> + the post is being deferred due to improper content
The phrase "improper content" does not appear in any standard GNU
Mailmam
I am not sure the best place to solve this problem but I will start with
this list since the problem is impacting a heavy traffic mailman listserv.
Google recently started enforcing only a single From: header in RFC2822
causing bounces to members of a very heavy traffic list. A single person
with
I have two lists which have started being spammed by non-members and
I have tried to set it for automatic discarding with no notification
to the admin.
However, I still get notices that my attention is required. When I
look at the list I see, for each problem post:
+ the post is being deferred
11 matches
Mail list logo
