Richard Damon writes:
> There is a fourth case, Host Provider sends the emails then sends you a
> bill for the overage at the rate specified in the contract. This could
> be very expensive for going that much over limit.
All I can say is, "ouch!" :-(
-
On 4/28/13 10:33 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Mark Sapiro writes:
>
> I have nothing to add to Mark's answer to question 1.
>
> > > 2- If that email consumes 200GB of my monthly bandwidth, while my
> > > monthly bandwidth limit is only 8GB, sending that one email will
> > > explode and break
Hi Mark and everyone,
I'm going to call this a bug, for lack of a better term.
I use Mailman version 2.1.11. It's hosted at my ISP and I have zero control
over upgrading. Sometimes they do some custom builds but I doubt that's an
issue here. I've had the same set of issues with previous vers
On 4/29/2013 6:44 AM, Adam McGreggor wrote:
[snip]
+1. Even 5000 seems to be the threshold these days, for unknown
netblocks.
Each has their own limit and sometimes it is based on history, sometimes
on number reported as spam. You can send 100k emails and if 1000 are
reported as spam you
On 4/29/2013 7:29 AM, DSH wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I could not get either script to work for me so
> perhaps that will come in the next post.
>
> When looking at the first script,
> (import_majordomo_into_mailman.pl) the fist thing I noticed was the
> assumption that “Majordomo has all of its lis
--- m...@msapiro.net wrote:
From: Mark Sapiro
To: kenwood0...@dogomania.com
CC: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Recovering EMail Addresses from Majordomo's
subscribers.D File
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:50:09 -0700
> On 4/24/2013 10:24 AM, DSH wrote:
>>
>> Is there some mean
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:33:31AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I can also tell you that in the three cases just mentioned, it doesn't
> matter what your footer says. All three have terms of service that
> allow them to decide what is spam based on any driteria they like.
> AFAIK, having an
