Re: [Mailman-Users] New to Mailman (and Linux)

2012-12-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Neil Carson wrote: > >My home ISP (Rogers.com) does not allow customers to run a 'mailserver' and >prevents us from doing so by blocking (I believe) certain outgoing/incoming >ports etc. > >Is there some way I can get around this restriction and actually send msgs >to/from my test-list via my hom

Re: [Mailman-Users] Unable to set defaults for header_filter_rules

2012-12-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mikael Jokela wrote: > >I would like to set a default value of header_filter_rules for new >lists. It would be something like this > >DEFAULT_HEADER_FILTER_RULES = [('X-Spam-Flag: YES', 3, False)] > >The purpose would be to discard all messages that are marked as spam. header_filter_rules is set

Re: [Mailman-Users] New to Mailman (and Linux)

2012-12-04 Thread jdanield
Le 03/12/2012 19:00, Neil Carson a écrit : I have been reading up on Mailman on http://list.org/ and http://en.opensuse.org . Are there other good resources out on the web for Mailman? if you happen to read french, I'm a happy opensuse/mailman user and blogged about it http://dodin.org/wo

[Mailman-Users] New to Mailman (and Linux)

2012-12-04 Thread Neil Carson
Hello, I am very new to Linux and Mailman. I have openSUSE 12.2 running on a 'box' at home and I have Mailman 2.1.14 installed. I am able to create a test-list either with the web interface or via command line. Not certain if Postfix is configured correctly. My home ISP (Rogers.com)

[Mailman-Users] Unable to set defaults for header_filter_rules

2012-12-04 Thread Mikael Jokela
Dear Mailman-users! I would like to set a default value of header_filter_rules for new lists. It would be something like this DEFAULT_HEADER_FILTER_RULES = [('X-Spam-Flag: YES', 3, False)] The purpose would be to discard all messages that are marked as spam. I can't get this kind of default con

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Karsten Becker
On 12/04/2012 07:39 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I wrote the above before realizing that others had replied and the > issue was resolved. I'm posting it anyway just for the detailed > interpretation of the smtplib debug messages. Thanks a lot anyway! Regards Karsten -- Karsten Becker Head of Infor

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Karsten Becker wrote: > >> Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: ('localhost', 10030) smtplib begins the connect process at 09:25:15 >> Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: (10030, 'localhost') at 09:25:15 smtplib has established a socket (connection) to port 10030 on local

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Karsten Becker : > No, chroot, default number of processes (= 100, far away from that), no > restrictions... > > > 127.0.0.1:10030 inetn - - - - smtpd This one IS chrooted... > > root@mail01.foodmz.local:/var/log/mailman# telnet localhost 10030 > > Trying ::1

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Karsten Becker
On 12/04/2012 03:15 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> Postfix presents it's banner 20 seconds after the connection has been >> established. >> >> Things to try: >> >> * disable chroot for THAT smtpd on port 10030 >> * check that you have enough instances of that particular smtpd >> (otherwise mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Stephen J. Turnbull : > > Karsten Becker writes: > > > WTF? > > > > > > > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: ('localhost', 10030) > > > > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: (10030, 'localhost') > > > > Dec 04 09:25:36 2012 qrunner(8680): reply:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Stephen J. Turnbull : > Karsten Becker writes: > > WTF? > > > > > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: ('localhost', 10030) > > > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: (10030, 'localhost') > > > Dec 04 09:25:36 2012 qrunner(8680): reply: '220 mail01.foodmz.local > ESMT

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Karsten Becker writes: > WTF? > > > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: ('localhost', 10030) > > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: (10030, 'localhost') > > Dec 04 09:25:36 2012 qrunner(8680): reply: '220 mail01.foodmz.local > > ESMTP Ecologic Institute ready\r\n'

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
> Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: ('localhost', 10030) > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: (10030, 'localhost') > Dec 04 09:25:36 2012 qrunner(8680): reply: '220 mail01.foodmz.local ESMTP Ecologic Institute ready\r\n' It looks like "localhost" is being gray-listed, or so

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman needs 20 seconds to complete per email

2012-12-04 Thread Karsten Becker
WTF? > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: ('localhost', 10030) > Dec 04 09:25:15 2012 qrunner(8680): connect: (10030, 'localhost') > Dec 04 09:25:36 2012 qrunner(8680): reply: '220 mail01.foodmz.local ESMTP > Ecologic Institute ready\r\n' > Dec 04 09:25:36 2012 qrunner(8680): repl