On 11/7/2012 10:06 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Since I both deleted the list and emptied the postfix queue, I'm still
> mystified as to why it didn't empty out immediately though.
If you delete a list and Mailman's OutgoingRunner is processing a
message for that list, as long as the runner is sti
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 18:02:27 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> ...
> >Obviously, this would result in a lot of pickles that are constantly
> >opened, edited (and, periodically cleansed), and closed. Is the
> >performance cost/benefit prohibitive?
>
> Whether the cost is prohibi
All,
FWIW, the queue emptied out after a few hours of my original report.
Since I both deleted the list and emptied the postfix queue, I'm still
mystified as to why it didn't empty out immediately though.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
On 11/6/2012 9:38 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> I am aware of how to get rid of shunted messages but I'd like to know
> if there are performance penalites for keeping a moderate amount
> (<1k) of messages around in the shunted queue for about a month.
>
> As far as I understand, the shunted queue
