Re: [Mailman-Users] Hangs when trying to start mailman as root

Lummoxx wrote: >...hangs on the line >groups = [x[2] for x in grp.getgrall() if mm_cfg.MAILMAN_USER in x[3]] It appears that the Python library function grp.getgrall() is hanging or looping. What happens if as root you invoke the Python command in the shebang line of bin/mailmanctl and then do

[Mailman-Users] Hangs when trying to start mailman as root

Regardless of method, "service mailman start", "./mailmanctl -s start", when I try to start mailman as root, it hangs. I modified the mailman user from the default of /sbin/nologin, to /bin/bash, so I could log in as mailman. When I'm logged in as mailman, it starts successfully. I did quite a b

Re: [Mailman-Users] messages in Pipermail archive thread viewaremostly out of order with no pattern

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >The problems I see are incorrect dates (May 2016 instead of Sep 2006) >in the From_ separator of those posts indexed at >. I forgot to mention, I see another, unrelated issue as well. The .txt.gz files ap

Re: [Mailman-Users] messages in Pipermail archive thread view aremostly out of order with no pattern

Rusty Newton wrote: >Mailman version 2.1.11 >Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) And whose package? See the FAQ at . >Has anyone seen this before? Yes >Example of the issue: >http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2012-September/thread.html This appear

Re: [Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions

Dennis Putnam wrote: > >The same might be true for >exceeding the size limit. To automatically reject or discard messages that exceed the list's size limit, find the section of the Mailman/Handlers/Hold.py that ends with the lines if bodylen/1024.0 > mlist.max_message_size:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reject reason not given in rejection message

Dennis Putnam wrote: > >I didn't send a reason explicitly. Since the reason was given as part of >the admin display, I thought that reason would go to the member as part >of the rejection message. Is that not the case? If not, I would consider >that a bug. It is the case that the default reason s

[Mailman-Users] messages in Pipermail archive thread view are mostly out of order with no pattern

Mailman version 2.1.11 Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) Description: A week or so ago, mailing list members started reporting an issue with the archives thread view for archives at lists.digium.com The thread view for just about any month or year I click on is all out of whack. The threads a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reject reason not given in rejection message

I didn't send a reason explicitly. Since the reason was given as part of the admin display, I thought that reason would go to the member as part of the rejection message. Is that not the case? If not, I would consider that a bug. On 9/24/2012 11:06 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Mailman 2.1.15.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reject reason not given in rejection message

Mailman 2.1.15. My reasons, unless I fail to give, always gets to the member/member-to-be. However, they fail to read them quite often! On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Dennis Putnam wrote: > I am getting complaints from list members that their messages are being > rejected without a reason. Wh

[Mailman-Users] Reject reason not given in rejection message

I am getting complaints from list members that their messages are being rejected without a reason. When I look at the message from the admin page, the reason show us there but when I reject the message the member apparently does not get that. Do I have something configured wrong? signature.asc D

Re: [Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions

On 9/24/2012 8:50 AM, Dennis Putnam wrote: I've seen various queries on this but nothing definitive about it being added as a feature or even a customizable mod. There are certain moderator actions that potentially could be automated. For example, I would never approve a posting from a non-membe

Re: [Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions

First, thanks for all the replies. The non-members filter seems to do exactly what I want. However, it is not clear what the members filter is doing. If I turn that on, does it mean every message will be Held, Rejected or Discarded? That does not make sense to me as I cannot think of any circumst

Re: [Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:50:13 +0100, Dennis Putnam wrote: I've seen various queries on this but nothing definitive about it being added as a feature or even a customizable mod. There are certain moderator actions that potentially could be automated. For example, I would never approve a posting

Re: [Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:02:07 +0100, Odhiambo Washington wrote: About message size, well, content filtering uses regexps, so perhaps you can craft something. I think content filtering only deals with attachments. Large messages from non-members are no problem as they can be discarded as no

Re: [Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Dennis Putnam wrote: > I've seen various queries on this but nothing definitive about it being > added as a feature or even a customizable mod. There are certain > moderator actions that potentially could be automated. For example, I > would never approve a postin

[Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions

I've seen various queries on this but nothing definitive about it being added as a feature or even a customizable mod. There are certain moderator actions that potentially could be automated. For example, I would never approve a posting from a non-member of a restricted list. It would make my moder