Re: [Mailman-Users] Gmail "features"

2012-08-08 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Lucio Crusca writes: > Actually I already suspected that no RFC said what a MUA should do with > messages. However Gmail is accessible via POP/IMAP also. AFAICT the same > messages are lost also when accessing gmail via POP/IMAP, and in that case > GMail is not only a MUA and it does break

Re: [Mailman-Users] Gmail "features"

2012-08-08 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:09:22 +0200 Lucio Crusca wrote: Hello Lucio, >Brad Rogers writes: >> Send: smtp.foo.bar >Does that mean that I must have an external (from my mailman server >point of view) smtp server? That would explain everything, but that I believe so, yes. I only run one list, and do

Re: [Mailman-Users] Gmail "features"

2012-08-08 Thread Lucio Crusca
Stephen J. Turnbull writes: > Lucio Crusca writes: > > Feel free to try subscribing to the above list and try posting from > > gmail. > > OK, but it will have to wait until tomorrow. I need to sleep after > that last goal by Mexico. :-( Probably you don't need to try anymore (see Brad Rogers'

Re: [Mailman-Users] Gmail "features"

2012-08-08 Thread Lucio Crusca
Brad Rogers writes: > Gmail has *always* been that way. There is a workaround. Maybe it is > employed (if only by accident) on the lists you mention. It is required > that the list be set up with the following; > > Receive: list.foo.bar Ok, I think the example fits my case (3rd level domain is