Re: [Mailman-Users] Giving away the secrets of 99.3% email delivery

2012-05-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
David wrote: > >For a mailing list, would I have to expand my SigningTable in any way? My >opendkim SigningTable currently only has an entry for >*@list.example.com(which is associated with list._ >domainkey.example.com). > >But /var/log/mail.log shows a lot of entries like this: > >no signing tabl

Re: [Mailman-Users] Giving away the secrets of 99.3% email delivery

2012-05-12 Thread David
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > David wrote: > > > >I have DKIM implemented with opendkim and Postfix and messages sent out > via > >sendmail are signed properly. > > > >However, messages sent out to the list's users by Mailman are not DKIM > >signed. Any suggestions? > > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Giving away the secrets of 99.3% email delivery

2012-05-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
David wrote: > >I have DKIM implemented with opendkim and Postfix and messages sent out via >sendmail are signed properly. > >However, messages sent out to the list's users by Mailman are not DKIM >signed. Any suggestions? Is Mailman sending outgoing mail via your local Postfix. These headers fr

Re: [Mailman-Users] Giving away the secrets of 99.3% email delivery

2012-05-12 Thread David
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > DKIM signing is normally done in an outgoing MTA. SPF and reverse DNS > are DNS things, not Mailman. > > In general, best practices for Mailman servers are the same as best > practices for sending mail in general. > > Mailman does have the a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Migration Problem - No Publicly Advertised Lists

2012-05-12 Thread Dennis Putnam
Thanks again. I did not, I had to boot anyway for other reasons and I thought that would be sufficient. Obviously not. In any case I had to run check_perms a couple of times but it seems to be working OK now. On 5/12/2012 9:53 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Dennis Putnam wrote: >> Ah! I took your comma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Migration Problem - No Publicly Advertised Lists

2012-05-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dennis Putnam wrote: > >Ah! I took your command literally. So the problem is that my mm_cfg.py >seems to not be working. The resulting URL has the local FQDN not what I >specified. Here is my mm_cfg.py (sanitized): Did you run fix_url AFTER editing mm_cfg.py? If so, what is the exact command you

Re: [Mailman-Users] Migration Problem - No Publicly Advertised Lists

2012-05-12 Thread Dennis Putnam
Ah! I took your command literally. So the problem is that my mm_cfg.py seems to not be working. The resulting URL has the local FQDN not what I specified. Here is my mm_cfg.py (sanitized): # -*- python -*- # Copyright (C) 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002 by the Free Software Foundation, Inc. # # This pro