On 1/18/2012 1:07 PM, Peter STUMPF wrote:
>
> I've sent again a message to be able to trace the actions on the
> server. The only file which got touched was the config.pck, the
> config.pck.last and the request.pck. Everything else didn't receive
> an updated timestamp. the 'in', 'out' and 'virgin
I've sent again a message to be able to trace the actions on the server. The
only file which got touched was the config.pck, the config.pck.last and the
request.pck. Everything else didn't receive an updated timestamp. the 'in',
'out' and 'virgin' do have the date of today, but the time is set
Anthony Harrison wrote:
>
>Whenever I attempt to run fix_url on any of the lists, however, I receive
>the following error:
>
>Importing fix_url...
>Running fix_url.fix_url()...
>Loading list itsac-test (locked)
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "./withlist", line 299, in
>main()
> F
On 1/18/2012 10:47 AM, Peter STUMPF wrote:
>
> I've checked the whole qfiles folder - besides the 'bad' subfolder,
> everything is empty, so there's nothing in the 'shunt' folder.
> The file in the 'bad' is rather old and I know that the mailing list was
> working at that time.
Files in qfiles
I'm attempting to migrate a number of lists from Mailman 2.1.11 on a box
running Ubuntu 8.04.3 to Mailman 2.1.14 running on a box with Red Hat
Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2. I've installed Mailman on the Red Hat
box according to the installation guide and have successfully created a
working m
Ah... thanks for the heads-up!
In our case, the IP and time can lead me to the computer as well.
Thanks!
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:45 PM
To: Bruce Harrison; mailman-users@python.org
Cc: Terry Lewis
Subject:
Hi,
thanks for the reply!
Looks like I missed a '1'. I'm actually using 2.1.11
The fault was repeatable - I had sent many messages to the address, but always
had the same problem.
I've checked the whole qfiles folder - besides the 'bad' subfolder, everything
is empty, so there's nothing in the
Bruce Harrison wrote:
>The idea of matching web log entries (access_log) with timestamp works fine.
>Also noticed that the email address of the approved message is also in the
>log, which makes it much easier. Entry from access_log was:
>
>10.x.x.x - - [17/Jan/2012:17:35:52 -0600] "GET
>/mail
The idea of matching web log entries (access_log) with timestamp works fine.
Also noticed that the email address of the approved message is also in the log,
which makes it much easier. Entry from access_log was:
10.x.x.x - - [17/Jan/2012:17:35:52 -0600] "GET
/mailman/admindb/information?sende
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:03:57PM +, Bruce Harrison wrote:
> Is there any way to identify which moderator approved a post.
> I've looked thru the /logs files and didn't see anything.
Check your web-server logs for the IP address, and work from there?
Or if by email, look at headers?
--
"I
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:42:52PM +, Bruce Harrison wrote:
> I don't think the headers show who the moderator would be.
Message-ID, perhaps?
--
"In matters of grave importance, style, not sincerity, is the vital
thing"
-- The Importance of Being Earnest
---
Glad to hear it's changing. We have several lists on campus with 20+
moderators. Some will approve anything without paying attention at all :)
Was just poking around in the access_log, looks like that may do it.
Thanks!
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:s
I don't think the headers show who the moderator would be. Web-server logs
sound like a possibility.
Anyone done this?
Bruce
UTM
-Original Message-
From: Adam McGreggor [mailto:a...@hendricks.amyl.org.uk] On Behalf Of Adam
McGreggor
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:41 AM
To: Bruce
Bruce Harrison writes:
> Is there any way to identify which moderator approved a post.
> I've looked thru the /logs files and didn't see anything.
Assuming it was done via the web interface, you could get the
timestamp from the Mailman logs, then go to the webserver log and find
out who accesse
Stefan P. Wolf (NassRasur.com) writes:
> Now I would like to be able to create also a *real* mail
> account with the same address, for SENDING (outgoing mail)
> only.
I think all you need to do is create the mailing list as usual, and
then create the system user with the same name. The mailin
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Peter STUMPF wrote:
* version of mailman: 2.1.1
Are you sure? This version is *ancient*.
Geoff.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman
Is there any way to identify which moderator approved a post.
I've looked thru the /logs files and didn't see anything.
Bruce Harrison
UT Martin
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailma
Peter STUMPF writes:
> *version of mailman: 2.1.1
Did you write that correctly? That's very old.
> The message just disappeared.
Was it just one message, or is the fault repeatable?
> I went to the logs of exim and found the message had been processed
> correctly.
>
> In the logs o
Hi,
system info:
* version of mailman: 2.1.1
* installed from source
* Linux version 2.6.26-2-686 (Debian 2.6.26-26lenny1)
* exim4
I ran into this problem today, when I sent a message to my mailing list.
The message just disappeared. Normally I get a moderation m
scenario:
I run a discussion forum and we have a closed list where
the members are the moderators of the forum. Forum users
can write to all moderators through this list's address.
Let's say the address is m...@myforum.mydomain.com
Now I would like to be able to create also a *real* mail
accoun
20 matches
Mail list logo
