Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 11/01/12 00:05, Mark Sapiro wrote: > If you want to scrub attachments only from 'large' messages, this > feature won't do it. You would need to do something such as creating a > custom handler (see ) that would invoke > the scrubber process only on large messages an

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Syafril Hermansyah wrote: > >Oops wait a minute it seems there is something not working as expected. >Actually the message size not exceed the list size limit, but still >Mailman scrubbed by the attachment. >Where am I wrong? If you set scrub_nondigest to Yes, all attachments will be scrubbed

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 10/01/12 23:19, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: > Wow it work fine! > I don't even need to approve, the message passed through to the list > with attachment link listed for every single attachment. Oops wait a minute it seems there is something not working as expected. Actually the message size

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 10/01/12 16:02, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: >> > No, not without changes. At least not if the held message is not >> > approved. >> > If what you want is for max_message_size to apply to the message as >> > received before scrubbing, then that is what you will get without >> > making changes to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 01/10/2012 12:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> just need to confirm, if I set list restriction to 1024 KB (for example) >> will MailMan scrub the attachment (and making attachment linking, URL >> link) if the posting exceed 1024 KB? > > > No, not without changes. At least not if the held message i