Re: [Mailman-Users] Rather perplexing set of problems with a new 2.1.14vhost install on a DirectAdmin box -- and I'm new to Mailman

Christopher Woods (CustomMade) wrote: > Wondering if part of the problems are due to the OS (CentOS)... This > VPS came specced with it, and I went along with the choice. Little > was I aware of the development approach with regards to new and > shiny... (this is your cue to all have a chuckle at m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Rather perplexing set of problems with a new 2.1.14vhost install on a DirectAdmin box -- and I'm new to Mailman

Christopher Woods \(CustomMade\) writes: > Crikey Mark, thanks for your great response Yeah, +1 to that! > Have to cop to it - part of the reason I went with that specific > install guide was because I'm working in a DA environment (a little > nonstandard to begin with). "DA" == "disability

Re: [Mailman-Users] Rather perplexing set of problems with a new 2.1.14vhost install on a DirectAdmin box -- and I'm new to Mailman

> If you really need the vhosts branch, I'll work with you on > the problems, but if you can live with globally unique list > names, I suggest you update your Python to 2.6.x and install > either the > 2.1.14-1 tarball from > or the head of the > branc

Re: [Mailman-Users] Rather perplexing set of problems with a new 2.1.14vhost install on a DirectAdmin box -- and I'm new to Mailman

Christopher Woods \(CustomMade\) wrote: > >After becoming frustrated with Majordomo I decided to install Mailman on a >DirectAdmin box I fell into managing. After some research I found Mark >Sapiro's 2.1.14 vhost port >(https://code.launchpad.net/~msapiro/mailman/vhost) which includes some >fixes a

[Mailman-Users] Rather perplexing set of problems with a new 2.1.14 vhost install on a DirectAdmin box -- and I'm new to Mailman

Hi all, After becoming frustrated with Majordomo I decided to install Mailman on a DirectAdmin box I fell into managing. After some research I found Mark Sapiro's 2.1.14 vhost port (https://code.launchpad.net/~msapiro/mailman/vhost) which includes some fixes and merges of virtual hosting patches t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

Robert P. Schwartz wrote: >I seem to have the same problem. It only happens sometimes and to different >users. Tell the users that when they receive duplicates, they need to send copies of both messages including all headers to you - preferably forwarded as attachments, but any way that preserv

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

Carlos Palomino wrote: >It appears they are replying to all, as in the few header samples I've seen, >there are two instances of the group address (in the To and CC fields). > >I have the setting checked to filter out duplicates, but still receiving >complaints. >Not sure how to handle this, as

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

I seem to have the same problem. It only happens sometimes and to different users. Robert P. Schwartz 206 Cedar Pond Drive Madison, AL 35757 Phone: 256.830.2933 Cell: 256.509.2981 E-mail: rpsch...@knology.net -Original Message- From: mailman-users-bounces+rpschwar=knology@

Re: [Mailman-Users] archive_private locks up admin interface?

At 10:32 PM -0800 11/22/11, Mark Sapiro wrote: Daniel Griscom wrote: In the Archiving Options page, I found the "archive_private" setting. >The description was a bit vague, but it seemed to be what I wanted, and currently was set to "public". So, I set it to "private", and submitted. Problem 2

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

On 11/23/2011 4:11 AM, Carlos Palomino wrote: Hello all, Several subscribers of my list are complaining of duplicate posts. They say it happens "only sometimes". Are there any common reasons for such occurrences? I don't experience this on my test-member account or in my regularly subscri

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

It appears they are replying to all, as in the few header samples I've seen, there are two instances of the group address (in the To and CC fields). I have the setting checked to filter out duplicates, but still receiving complaints. Not sure how to handle this, as it seems to be on the user's e

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

Mailman Admin wrote: >On 2011-11-23 11:11, Carlos Palomino wrote: >> >> Several subscribers of my list are complaining of duplicate posts. They say >> it happens "only sometimes". >> >> Are there any common reasons for such occurrences? I don't experience this >> on my test-member account or

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

On 2011-11-23 11:11, Carlos Palomino wrote: > > Several subscribers of my list are complaining of duplicate posts. They say > it happens "only sometimes". > > Are there any common reasons for such occurrences? I don't experience this > on my test-member account or in my regularly subscribed a

Re: [Mailman-Users] inactivating bounce processing to speed up list performance

* Lluis Montoliu : > Thanks Ralf, I understand. > > Apologies If I did not make myself understandable. I am not sending > garbage to non-existing addresses. All addresses are verified and > existing but not all messages appear to be delivered equally well, to > my surprise, while some servers appe

Re: [Mailman-Users] inactivating bounce processing to speed up list performance

Thanks Ralf, I understand. Apologies If I did not make myself understandable. I am not sending garbage to non-existing addresses. All addresses are verified and existing but not all messages appear to be delivered equally well, to my surprise, while some servers appear to refuse messages comin

[Mailman-Users] Duplicate posts?

Hello all, Several subscribers of my list are complaining of duplicate posts. They say it happens "only sometimes". Are there any common reasons for such occurrences? I don't experience this on my test-member account or in my regularly subscribed address, so it's difficult to track down. A

Re: [Mailman-Users] inactivating bounce processing to speed up list performance

* Lluis Montoliu : > Dear listers, > I eventually traced that my mailman installation is delaying the > distribution of messages because it is trapped in a bunch of "bounce > processing", dealing with undelivered messages, etc... in this > regard, could I simply inactivate bounce processing? No.

[Mailman-Users] inactivating bounce processing to speed up list performance

Dear listers, I eventually traced that my mailman installation is delaying the distribution of messages because it is trapped in a bunch of "bounce processing", dealing with undelivered messages, etc... in this regard, could I simply inactivate bounce processing? If I do so I should expect an