Anne Wainwright writes:
> The first is reflected in the users FAQ 3.10 "How to enforce a
> text-plain policy". The answer being "with difficulty" because this
> option probably (as I read it) ensures that any message with
> non-plain-text content is completely, utterly, and totally, rejected,
Dear Lindsay,
perhaps I can make an input to this thread since I was about to
post something similar. If my comments are incorrect, please advise
since I have no desire to mislead any one.
We, too, have a load of old dinosaurs on one list who always manage to
post to wrong addresses and whose pos
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Message: 25
>> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:42:29 -0700
>> From: "foo bar" <...>
>> To: cyberpluck...@autoharp.org
>> Subject: Re: [CP] Intro
>> Message-ID:
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http
Lindsay Haisley writes:
> One of two things needs to happen. Either the list server should refuse
> and bounce posts with no MIME text/plain part,
Refuse, maybe, but bouncing is a problem (spam-by-backscatter). But
refusing such mail is only going to confuse the kind of subscriber who
is as "
