Thanks to you both. Adding To and From headers solves the issue, and the mail
is accepted.
Regards,
--
Ian Gibbs
i...@flash.org.uk
Mon - Wed: +31 (0) 629 202752
Thu - Sun: +44 (0) 7815 142001
On 11/03/11 18:26, Larry Stone wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Larry's response is c
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> Richard Troy wrote:
> >
> >In sum, it would be _fantastic_ if list subscribers have an
> >option to receive or not receive attachments on a per-user basis, much as
> >users can now elect to recieve digests. But, as that option doesn't appear
> >to exist
On 3/11/2011 7:47 AM, Doug Gaff wrote:
> text/html is definitely missing from pass_mime_type. I can add that,
> but I'm wondering why that type isn't included by default in the
> install. Are there other problems that this introduces?
Many users don't want HTML posts on their lists, even if 'conv
Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>Cool - but where is this option found??
Non-digest options -> scrub_nondigest
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mail
Marcello Villani wrote:
>Hi,
>I have the following lists in my environment:
>li...@mydomain.org
>li...@mydomain.org
>li...@mydomain.org
>
>Some members are inside two or three lists.
>
>My goal is to avoid duplicate emails for people who belong to more
>than one list!!
Don't cross post .
>I in
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Larry's response is correct except for this one detail. Actually, this
message has a Subject: header and a non-conformant "This" header and
no body. The body must be separated from the headers by an empty line.
Oops. I looked at the original way too quic
Larry Stone wrote:
>
>You have no To: header (or any other headers for that matter).
[...]
>> DATA
>> 354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
>> Subject:Testing from guinevere 3
>> This is a message 3
>> .
>> 250 OK id=1Py3ZU-0003YI-Rz
Larry's response is correct except for this on
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Ian Gibbs wrote:
Dear all,
I have read http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030676 FAQ 1.9
about implicit destination. I am sending directly To: the list with no other
recipients. The host_name setting is pumb.org.uk. The conversation I had with
the SMTP se
On 2011-03-11 5:27 AM, Mailman Admin wrote:
> You can move attachments from incoming emails to the archive and send
> only a link to it to recipients.
>
> In this way only those who are interested in the attachment will have to
> download it.
Cool - but where is this option found??
--
Dear all,
I have read http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030676 FAQ 1.9 about implicit
destination. I am sending directly To: the list with no other recipients. The host_name setting is
pumb.org.uk. The conversation I had with the SMTP server is shown below. It still results in
Hi,
I have the following lists in my environment:
li...@mydomain.org
li...@mydomain.org
li...@mydomain.org
Some members are inside two or three lists.
My goal is to avoid duplicate emails for people who belong to more
than one list!!
I installed mailman 2.1.13: as far as I know this version has
text/html is definitely missing from pass_mime_type. I can add that, but I'm
wondering why that type isn't included by default in the install. Are there
other problems that this introduces?
I've sent html to this list before via Outlook 2007, but this particular user
is using Outlook 2010. Gues
Hello Richard Troy
On 03/10/2011 01:42 AM, Richard Troy wrote:
>
> Up until now many list participants on a list I manage have been
> clammoring for attachments, but in deference to some, we've prevented
> them. Now that the server has had its hardware upgraded and a new O/S
> installed (Fedora C
13 matches
Mail list logo