Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>I meant I don't have a specific apache2 listener for mailman, like I do
>for my other websites, I've only been (tryingto) add the rewrite rule (I
>keep my rewrite rules in one .conf file, and the vhosts in individual
>files per host)... maybe I need to create one that is listeni
On 2010-12-23 2:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> I set:
>>
>> DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN = 'https://%s:#/mailman/'
>>
>> Where # is the 5 digit port I set it to, then I ran:
>>
>> # ./withlist -l -a -r fix_url
>> I also added the redirect for the non-ssl host to the ssl host per the
>> instructions
Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>I'm trying to get things working on a non-standard port along the lines
>of the How-To found here:
>
>http://www.wesayso.net
>
>(I know, I know, this is not ideal, but it does work well for all of the
>other sites I've set up, now I'd just like to transition my mailman
>install
Konstantin Vasilyev wrote:
>
>I try to integrate my Postfix with Mailman.
>I use tip from FAQ here http://wiki.list.org/x/ZoCj
>I have error message
>bin/genaliases
>sed: illegal option -- r
>usage: sed script [-Ealn] [-i extension] [file ...]
> sed [-Ealn] [-i extension] [-e script] ... [-f
Paul Evenden wrote:
>I have been using mailman for over 2 years and since december 2010 it has not
>been sending out my group emails nor have I been receiving requests for
>subscribing. Nothing has changed that I know of.
>how can I test? where do I look?
Perhaps Mailman or one or more qrunner
Hillo,
I try to integrate my Postfix with Mailman.
I use tip from FAQ here http://wiki.list.org/x/ZoCj
I have error message
bin/genaliases
sed: illegal option -- r
usage: sed script [-Ealn] [-i extension] [file ...]
sed [-Ealn] [-i extension] [-e script] ... [-f script_file] ...
[file ...]
I have been using mailman for over 2 years and since december 2010 it has not
been sending out my group emails nor have I been receiving requests for
subscribing. Nothing has changed that I know of.
how can I test? where do I look?
Paul evenden
www.copperskymusic.com
www.farewellcd.com
---
Thanks a lot for your help here Mark...
On 2010-12-22 5:01 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Hmmm... so, is 4.29 - which says otherwise (and which is referenced from
>> the FAQ you pointed me to below)- no longer valid?
>>
>> http://wiki.list.org/x/7oA9
> 4.29 or 4.27?
Wups, sorry, ye
