Re: [Mailman-Users] 'ack' doesn't work when sending as list rather thansender?

Christopher Adams wrote: >I just figured out that a sender can only get an acknowledgment with >'ack' checked if the list is sending as the sender as opposed to list >name. Is there anyway that a sender can get an acknowledgment even if >the list is set up this way? By "sending as ... list name"

[Mailman-Users] 'ack' doesn't work when sending as list rather than sender?

Christopher Adams writes: > I just figured out that a sender can only get an acknowledgment with > 'ack' checked if the list is sending as the sender as opposed to list > name. Is there anyway that a sender can get an acknowledgment even if > the list is set up this way? I believe that the lis

[Mailman-Users] 'ack' doesn't work when sending as list rather than sender?

I just figured out that a sender can only get an acknowledgment with 'ack' checked if the list is sending as the sender as opposed to list name. Is there anyway that a sender can get an acknowledgment even if the list is set up this way? -- Christopher Adams adam...@gmail.com -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Preventing from getting on spam list

Hung Phan wrote: > >What measures can we take to prevent us from being tagged as spammer again? >All our lists are always set to not allow non-members post. Is it even worth >$102 annually to be on whitelisted.org? I believe whitelisted.org will drop us >immediately out of the whitelist as soon

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.14 Multiple Owner(s) Patch - Problem

Barry Finkel wrote: >I am testing Mailman 2.1.14 via a Debian/Ubuntu package I built >from the SourceForge source. I included the "multiple list owner" >patch from Mark Sapiro (Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:11:06 -0700). > >I created a new list, and I specified two addresses in response to the > > Ente

Re: [Mailman-Users] BATV and Mailman

Thank you for your replies. I investigate further and found that it was a Postfix error in configuration. Though I don't understand if BATV was truly playing a part in it, the server was rejecting unverified senders, but there wasn't a hash map to indicate verified senders. I have fixed this. I ba

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.14 Multiple Owner(s) Patch - Problem

I am testing Mailman 2.1.14 via a Debian/Ubuntu package I built from the SourceForge source. I included the "multiple list owner" patch from Mark Sapiro (Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:11:06 -0700). I created a new list, and I specified two addresses in response to the Enter the email(s) of the person

Re: [Mailman-Users] Auto-unsubscribe from other lists

Hung Phan wrote: > >We have multiple lists that users can subscribe to and one big list that we >manually update periodically. Is there a solution for users to subscribe to >one list and automatically subscribe to the big list? If the multiple, small lists do not allow digests, or if digest sub

Re: [Mailman-Users] security implications for adding apache to mailmangroup

Syn, Joonho wrote: >I'm writing a mailman dashboard page for my company using cgi/perl but in >order to get the necessary info I'll need to give apache read access to all >the current .pck files as well as any made in the future. What are the >security implications of adding apache to the mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Making every subscriber get the digest

Rob Brandt wrote: >Hi. I have a list where the moderators have asked that every subscriber >be switched to the digest version. How do I do this, short of a few >hundred clicks in the UI? I'm thinking withlist, but don't see any >examples... There is a script at

[Mailman-Users] Auto-unsubscribe from other lists

Hello, We have multiple lists that users can subscribe to and one big list that we manually update periodically. Is there a solution for users to subscribe to one list and automatically subscribe to the big list? For the unsubscribe, can the users see all the lists that they subscribe to and ch

Re: [Mailman-Users] Preventing from getting on spam list

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Hung Phan wrote: > We are a school district which sends out legitimate messages about school > information to parents but last week, we were tagged by spamrats as > spammer. An important message did not reach all the subscribers because > the local ISP which hosts many of o

Re: [Mailman-Users] Preventing from getting on spam list

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Hung Phan wrote: We are a school district which sends out legitimate messages about school information to parents but last week, we were tagged by spamrats as spammer. An important message did not reach all the subscribers because the local ISP which hosts many of our pare

[Mailman-Users] Preventing from getting on spam list

Hello, We are a school district which sends out legitimate messages about school information to parents but last week, we were tagged by spamrats as spammer. An important message did not reach all the subscribers because the local ISP which hosts many of our parents' emails, subscribes to spamr

[Mailman-Users] security implications for adding apache to mailman group

I'm writing a mailman dashboard page for my company using cgi/perl but in order to get the necessary info I'll need to give apache read access to all the current .pck files as well as any made in the future. What are the security implications of adding apache to the mailman group or just using

[Mailman-Users] Making every subscriber get the digest

Hi. I have a list where the moderators have asked that every subscriber be switched to the digest version. How do I do this, short of a few hundred clicks in the UI? I'm thinking withlist, but don't see any examples... Rob -- Mailman-Users