CJ Keist wrote:
>Running the bash command came back to the prompt with no errors.
>
>
>On 8/7/10 10:26 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> bash -c 'for p in ; do echo Huh? $p ; done'
That's the expected result.
Per your immediately previous post, it seems the issue was some
incompatibility with a specifi
Running the bash command came back to the prompt with no errors.
On 8/7/10 10:26 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
bash -c 'for p in ; do echo Huh? $p ; done'
--
C. J. Keist Email: cj.ke...@colostate.edu
UNIX/Network ManagerPhone: 970-491-0630
Engineering Network Serv
Another update.
It looks to be a make problem. The make I used was in
/usr/ccs/bin. Using GNU make, in /usr/sfw/bin ran just fine.
On 8/7/10 10:26 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
- Original Message ---
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman install problems (syntax error
atline1:`;
- Original Message ---
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman install problems (syntax error
atline1:`; ' unexpected)
From: CJ Keist
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:25:19 -0600
To: Mark Sapiro
Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" ,
mailman-users@python.org
>If this help
Mark Sapiro writes:
> I agree that the underlying issue is with the shell, but in at least
> these bash versions:
>
> GNU bash, version 3.2.49(22)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
>
> GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (i386-apple-darwin10.0)
>
> GNU bash, version 3.1.17(1)-release (i686-redha
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I agree that the underlying issue is with the shell, but in at least
these bash versions:
GNU bash, version 3.2.49(22)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (i386-apple-darwin10.0)
GNU bash, version 3.1.17(1)-release (i686-redhat-l
If this helps. I'm on Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC. This make
installed failed with
tcsh - version 6.12.00
bash - version 3.00.16(1)
As for bourne shell, don't know how to get the version info.
On 8/7/10 9:13 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mark Sapiro writes
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Mark Sapiro writes:
> > CJ Keist wrote:
>
> > >I simply commented out the for p loop:
> > >
> > > #for p in $(PACKAGES); \
>
> > That is a perfectly acceptable workaround, but the question is why
> > doesn't your make properly handle
> >
> >for p in ; do
Hello Mailman Users,
Systers has developed the ability for a user to subscribe and unsubscribe
from threads via Dynamic Sub-Lists. We've have gsoc students working on
bug-fixes and improvements the last two years and we'd really like to make
the feature available to the larger community running 2
