Re: [Mailman-Users] Possibly OT: VERP to plussed addresses

2010-02-28 Thread LuKreme
On 28-Feb-10 22:34, Mark Sapiro wrote: And a Happy Mailman Day to you too;). Sweet, does this mean I get the day off work? -- And there were all the stars, looking remarkably like powered diamonds spilled on black velvet, the stars that lured and ultimately called the boldest towards them...

Re: [Mailman-Users] Possibly OT: VERP to plussed addresses

2010-02-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/28/2010 9:11 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote: > I have noticed that Mailman seems to be capable to correctly parse > bounces that come from a plussed address. Example: I'm subscribed to > this list with > > cite+mailman-us...@example.net > > so the sender address looks like this: > > mailman-user

[Mailman-Users] Possibly OT: VERP to plussed addresses

2010-02-28 Thread Stefan Foerster
I have noticed that Mailman seems to be capable to correctly parse bounces that come from a plussed address. Example: I'm subscribed to this list with cite+mailman-us...@example.net so the sender address looks like this: mailman-users-bounces+cite+mailman-users=example@python.org While it's

Re: [Mailman-Users] digest mode links

2010-02-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
LuKreme wrote: >On 28-Feb-10 11:03, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION = True > >Would that be considered unsafe? > >I mean, it SEEMS unsafe, but is it really? It could be. Suppose I send a message to your list with an attached evil_app.exe file that I call Content-

Re: [Mailman-Users] digest mode links

2010-02-28 Thread LuKreme
On 28-Feb-10 11:03, Mark Sapiro wrote: SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION = True Would that be considered unsafe? I mean, it SEEMS unsafe, but is it really? -- Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out. -- Mailman-Users ma

Re: [Mailman-Users] digest mode links

2010-02-28 Thread LuKreme
On 28-Feb-10 09:59, John Griessen wrote: A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DSC04246.JPG Type: application/octet-stream Because it was defined incorrectly as an application/octet stream instead of as an image/jpeg -- I draw the line at 7 unreturned phone calls.

Re: [Mailman-Users] digest mode links

2010-02-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
John Griessen wrote: >Why do digest mode links rename a .jpg file? A Mac OS X user can't see >attachments. > > >URL: > >-- next part -- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed

[Mailman-Users] digest mode links

2010-02-28 Thread John Griessen
Why do digest mode links rename a .jpg file? A Mac OS X user can't see attachments. URL: -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DSC04246.JPG Type: