Re: [Mailman-Users] qfiles/shunt

2010-01-17 Thread Con Wieland
thanks Mark! it was a file permission error: Jan 15 18:54:54 2010 (8602) Uncaught runner exception: [Errno 13] Permission den ied: '/opt/nsp/mailman/archives/private/mc-niebla/index.html' con On Jan 17, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: Con Wieland wrote: I do not understand how thin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sibling List Problem [cPanel]

2010-01-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 17, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > We'll still need users willing to piss off cPanel and their ISPs by > invoking their GPL/Affero rights. I don't think switching licenses is feasible. MM3 is GPLv3. I'd much rather try to get cPanel to engage more with the Mailman commun

[Mailman-Users] qfiles/shunt

2010-01-17 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Con Wieland writes: > I do not understand how thinks end up here. I thought shunting was > done before the message went to the archive but this particular list > has no archive. Can someone help me understand why this was shunted? > Does that mean it wasn't sent to the list? Yes, it mea

Re: [Mailman-Users] qfiles/shunt

2010-01-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Con Wieland wrote: > >I do not understand how thinks end up here. I thought shunting was >done before the message went to the archive but this particular list >has no archive. Can someone help me understand why this was shunted? >Does that mean it wasn't sent to the list? Shunting occurs wh

[Mailman-Users] qfiles/shunt

2010-01-17 Thread Con Wieland
I do not understand how thinks end up here. I thought shunting was done before the message went to the archive but this particular list has no archive. Can someone help me understand why this was shunted? Does that mean it wasn't sent to the list? Con Wieland University of California at I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sibling List Problem [cPanel]

2010-01-17 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Adam McGreggor writes: > "Change the licence to one that requires external modifications to > be disclosed." > It needn't be restrospective, MM3 might be an ideal opportunity. Look at the GNU Affero GPL and see if that does what you want. I don't think anything stronger than that would fly (