Christopher Adams wrote:
>A spammer has subscribed completely unique addresses from the same domain to
>many of the mailing lists that we host. Is there a way to unsubscribe
>everything from this domain without writing a script that will do it?
If you mean 'automatically' as opposed to just manu
Hung Phan wrote:
>
>We have a list which transfered over from a different platform and it
>has multiple issues that we couldn't figure out. We thinking of delete
>the list and re-create it with the same name. Will there be any issue
>with re-create the list with the same name? Will bin/rmlist
A spammer has subscribed completely unique addresses from the same domain to
many of the mailing lists that we host. Is there a way to unsubscribe
everything from this domain without writing a script that will do it?
--
Christopher Adams
adam...@gmail.com
-
Hello,
We have a list which transfered over from a different platform and it
has multiple issues that we couldn't figure out. We thinking of delete
the list and re-create it with the same name. Will there be any issue
with re-create the list with the same name? Will bin/rmlist erases all
Alan McKay wrote:
>Well, I seem to have gotten it going again with some tweaks in my
>postfix. But that is still a mystery to me since it has worked fine
>like this for years.
It is possible that it has been marginal for some time and just some
little extra pushed it over the edge into a serio
Well, I seem to have gotten it going again with some tweaks in my
postfix. But that is still a mystery to me since it has worked fine
like this for years.
Thanks for your ears!
Most notable below is my "new" IP vs my "old" IP. I changed ISPs a
good 3 years ago now and evidently forgot to updat
Alan McKay wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Those messages have been delivered to the MTA. If the list has just 3
>> eligible recipients, that looks backlogged but otherwise normal. If
>> the messages haven't been delibvered, check the MTA (mailq or
>> whatever).
>
>H
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Those messages have been delivered to the MTA. If the list has just 3
> eligible recipients, that looks backlogged but otherwise normal. If
> the messages haven't been delibvered, check the MTA (mailq or
> whatever).
Here it is almost 2 hours l
On 1/2/2010 10:04 PM, Andrew Watson wrote:
#< #5.0.0 X-Postfix; host mysite.com[128.xxx.xxx.xxx] said: 553
5.3.0... User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command)>
#SMTP#
I ran newaliases. Same result.
The alias hs does appear in the /etc/mail/aliases:
Look in /etc/mail/sendmail.mc for how ALIAS
Alan McKay wrote:
>
>I look in the Mailman logs dir. Nothing really onerous that I see.
>I look in smtp and see what looks like normal processing. e.g. one of
>my lists looks like it had a number of messages just a few minutes
>ago, but I have not seen them yet where normally I would expect to s
JRC Groups wrote:
>
>On 1/1/10 8:46 AM, "Mark Sapiro" wrote:
>
>> JRC Groups wrote:
[...]
>>
>> I think an umbrella list is appropriate for your requirement. Most of
>> the issues with umbrella lists have to do with people who are members
>> of more than one subordinate list receiving multiple co
Geoff Shang wrote:
>On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, JRC Groups wrote:
>
>> This is indeed the case. All subscribers will either belong to one list or
>> the other. Never both. One of the issues I noticed when reading the post has
>> to do with replies from subscribers. Considering subscribers are either
>> re
Hey folks,
I've been running a FreeBSD / Postfix / Mailman list server for some 7
or 8 years now. The last time I updated FreeBSD was about 3 years
ago so it is only at 6.0. That was also the last time I updated
Postfix and Mailman until this recent spat of problems which prompted
me to upgrad
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, JRC Groups wrote:
This is indeed the case. All subscribers will either belong to one list or
the other. Never both. One of the issues I noticed when reading the post has
to do with replies from subscribers. Considering subscribers are either
receiving mail from Sublist1 or Su
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:15:15AM +0200, Geoff Shang wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, John Fitzsimons wrote:
> >It is interesting how that site talks about an email to web forum
> >bridge but they discuss it in a mailing list only. If the bridge works
> >then I appear to have missed where the testy we
Hi, Mark.
On 1/1/10 8:46 AM, "Mark Sapiro" wrote:
> JRC Groups wrote:
>>
>> On 12/30/09 6:47 AM, "Mark Sapiro" wrote:
>>
>>> There are also command-line tools for adding members and syncing
>>> membership with a flat file.
>>
>> When you mention flat file are you referring to a plain text f
Hi, Mark.
Thanks for your really helpful replies to my posts.
On 1/1/10 12:43 PM, "Mark Sapiro" wrote:
> Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>>
>> It might be easier to achieve with user education. Many 'modern' mail
>> clients can be configured to automatically (or not) download attachments and
>> whether
Hi, Carl.
Thanks for your reply and helpful suggestion.
On 1/1/10 11:49 AM, "Carl Zwanzig" wrote:
> JRC Groups wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to set-up user preferences so that every user can have its
>> subscription set to either receive or block attachments ? This would make
>> things a lot ea
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, John Fitzsimons wrote:
They say...
"1. Install the component via standard install procedures."
What are "standard install procedures" ? For windows users that
is simply double clicking an .exe file. What does that mean when
translated to unix ? If it is as simple as FTPing
19 matches
Mail list logo
