On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:10:28AM +1100, John Fitzsimons wrote:
> No idea why someone wanting a mailing list manager would NOT like to
> have additional functionality. If it were an option.
Function-creep/bloatware, things getting too big for their own boots?
I like small things. If I want extra
On Dec 23, 2009, at 02:57 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
>Making the leap to requiring the use of a Mailman
>rolled NNTP server is (IMHO) extremely arrogant. Offering an optional
>program that has been "tested to work with" (tm) is something completely
>different and acceptable.
No, Mailman will not
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:57:49 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
>On 12/22/09 22:24, John Fitzsimons wrote:
>> Okay, IF an NNTP setup were part of Mailman then that would IMO
>> encourage a huge number of hosters, that currently install Mailman,
>> to consider opening that port. Particularly as you cou
On 12/22/09 22:24, John Fitzsimons wrote:
Okay, IF an NNTP setup were part of Mailman then that would IMO
encourage a huge number of hosters, that currently install Mailman,
to consider opening that port. Particularly as you could put in the
installation documents that the Mailman NNTP facility
On Dec 23, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Derrick Wooden wrote:
> I'm well aware that SMTP doesn't mean instant.
Regretfully, you are the exception. Most people don't seem to get this concept
-- even people like my wife, and I've been trying to pound this one into her
brain for ten years.
> I'm just looki
I'm well aware that SMTP doesn't mean instant.
I'm just looking at a solution that can cut 1E6 emails being delivered in 12
hours down to say 4 hours. With a fast server, correct MTA optimization and
proper Mailman setup could this be attainable?
The Barack Obama email campaign used Postfix f
On Dec 23, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Derrick Wooden wrote:
> Brad, upon reading this thread again you are correct. It was NOT implied
> that MySQL would speed up email delivery, but rather MySQL would be a better
> database solution.
As a database, yes -- MySQL is better at that job than using Python "
Brad Knowles-3 wrote:
> I don't know of any way that MySQL would factor into this discussion. Can
> you provide a reference?
Brad, upon reading this thread again you are correct. It was NOT implied
that MySQL would speed up email delivery, but rather MySQL would be a better
database solution.
On Dec 23, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Barry Warsaw writes:
>
>> Mailman 3 is already more flexibly w.r.t. archivers, in the sense
>> that we define an interface between Mailman and generic archiver,
>> and then implement a number of modules to support everything from
>> Piper
Barry Warsaw writes:
> Mailman 3 is already more flexibly w.r.t. archivers, in the sense
> that we define an interface between Mailman and generic archiver,
> and then implement a number of modules to support everything from
> Pipermail to mail-archive.com to MHonArc. We should take the same
On Dec 23, 2009, at 5:50 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Barry Warsaw writes:
>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
>>> Please - not to start a 'distro' war, but if work is going to be done, I
>>> hope it will be done in a modular fashion so that other forum software
>>> (with a pl
Lucafr wrote:
>I have a mailing list with mailman 2.1.5: the list is moderate and I would
>like that the alert sent by mailman were not every day but in real time (I
>would like the admin will receive the alert everytime somebody send a
>message to the list).
Go to the web admin interface Genera
Hi all
I have a mailing list with mailman 2.1.5: the list is moderate and I would
like that the alert sent by mailman were not every day but in real time (I
would like the admin will receive the alert everytime somebody send a
message to the list).
Someone know if it is possinle and how?
Thanks in
Bernd Petrovitsch writes:
> On Don, 2009-12-17 at 17:04 -0800, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> > Lots of it depends on the MTA (general opinion is that postfix seems to be
> > the fastest), connectivity, and list settings (personalized email will
> > take
> Do I take the flame bait?;-)
>
> Whateve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Petrovitsch said the following on 23/12/09 11:20:
> a) Email/SMTP never was anywhere near "realtime" (though many people
>expect mails to be delivered in seconds),
Unfortunately, too much users tend to forget this basic concept: SMTP is not
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Dec 22, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> > Please - not to start a 'distro' war, but if work is going to be done, I
> > hope it will be done in a modular fashion so that other forum software
> > (with a plugin architecture) will be able to work with it.
>
>
On Don, 2009-12-17 at 17:04 -0800, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> Lots of it depends on the MTA (general opinion is that postfix seems to be
> the fastest), connectivity, and list settings (personalized email will take
Do I take the flame bait?;-)
Whatever you understand in detail under a "fast MTA" (and
17 matches
Mail list logo
