> It has been implemented on the 2.2 branch which is not yet released, so
> yes, you need to apply the patch to 2.1.12 if you need the
> functionality.
>
> Also, rather than incrementing Version.DATA_FILE_VERSION further and
> setting yourself up for this kind of problem again, you could leave it
Adam Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> Did the old installation have patches that increased it's
>> DATA_FILE_VERSION?
>
>Ah, of course, I completely forgot about that! Yes, I had applied this
>patch as you recommended when I installed the old version back in 2007:
>
>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
> It appears that the new server is running 2.1.10 or later with the
> "sibling lists" feature, and the old server from which the lists were
> moved did not have this feature, so the lists did not have the
> corresponding regular_exclude_lists and regular_include_lists
> attributes.
>
> However, t
I have often wondered about the inefficiencies of having every list
arrive at member removal via independent bounce processing. I think
there is value in removal of a bounced member from ALL lists.
This seems particularly useful where we have adapted the script from
the Pasus mailing lists sit
