Stefan Förster wrote:
>
> list_lists | awk '(NR > 1){print $1}' | \
or
list_lists --bare | \
> I'm running a Debian package of Mailman and I know that it is
> modified, I just don't know to which extent. Perhaps someone with more
> knowledge could comment on the availability of those two helper
Charles Gregory wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> Is there NO way to get a reminder notice to come FROM the
>>> list/list-owner, even given the obvious issue with possible multiple
>>> lists?
>> It's a simple change. Just send one reminder per list.
>
>How can I set that? (mm 2.1.
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Robert Fishel wrote:
I am subscribed to countless lists over 6 organizations that use
mailman one of which I run, there is no way I would want to receive a
reminder from each list, it's painful enough now for each
organization.
(nod) Perhaps a dash of intelligence in the not
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Is there NO way to get a reminder notice to come FROM the
list/list-owner, even given the obvious issue with possible multiple
lists?
It's a simple change. Just send one reminder per list.
How can I set that? (mm 2.1.5)
If you look carefully at the mess
Greg White wrote:
>
>It appears that part of my problem is that I didn't understand how to properly
>send a message. I have postfix only listening on the loopback interface. It
>appears like I will have to change the config so it listens on the eth0
>interface. Then I have to setup user authe
> Mark wrote:
>> Greg White wrote:
>>
>>Since the mailman account on a centos and redhat system is setup as nologin
>>how else would you send a post?
>
>
> Via SMTP to the incoming MTA.
>
>
>>I tried to post a message to the list. I started mutt, pressed m, to:
>>t...@xyz.com, subject test, wro
Charles Gregory wrote:
>
>Is there NO way to get a reminder notice to come FROM the
>list/list-owner, even given the obvious issue with possible multiple
>lists?
It's a simple change. Just send one reminder per list.
But I for one for example receive a reminder every Mailman Day from
python.or
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
For your amusement, and to emphasize my point, here is the message
I received as mailman-owner, because user SENT their mail to
'mailman-bounces'. (go fig)
I torture them with an appropriate autodiscard + autoreply
Well, my form letter has to be
* Charles Gregory :
> For your amusement, and to emphasize my point, here is the message
> I received as mailman-owner, because user SENT their mail to
> 'mailman-bounces'. (go fig)
I torture them with an appropriate autodiscard + autoreply
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteil
Once before, I asked about possible solutions to problems that occur
when people misread and/or 'reply' to mailman 'administrative' emails.
I would like to cut-n-paste a latest mailing from a list subscriber
to emphasize the problem.
I'm not asking for an 'explanation', but I *am* asking that
Oliver Glueck wrote:
>
>I get this Email (see below) with the notice that I have
>to confirm my membership because mails couldnot delivered to
>my mailbox.
>BUT: my mailbox is ok! Some other users (not all!) on the mailing list
>info get the same notice from mailman, but all mailboxes are ok
>and I
* Stefan Förster :
> In my case, this script returns "7", so smtp_mx_session_limit should
> be "4". The problem with this script is, however, that it relies on
> "list_lists" and "list_members" being available to a user with shell
> access.
on python.org it returns 18 and 10
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Stefan Förster :
> > | smtp_mx_session_limit (default: 2)
> >
> > While I can certainly imagine larger sites having somewhere between
> > five to ten MXs, 100 seems a bit... oversized.
>
> maybe it tries to set a very hight threshold, thus ALWAYS using ALL
> MXes?
You do
13 matches
Mail list logo
