J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> >Am i safe setting to off and then deleting this garbage?
>>
>>
>> You can delete any of it at any time. The worst that happens is someone
>> has saved a digest with a link that no longer works. If you actually
>> have no diges
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >Am i safe setting to off and then deleting this garbage?
>
>
> You can delete any of it at any time. The worst that happens is someone
> has saved a digest with a link that no longer works. If you actually
> have no digest members, this is not a proble
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> Yes. These are the attachments (or html parts) that were scrubbed from
>> the plain text digest and stored and replaced by links to the content
>> in the digest. The only way to avoid this is to set the list(s)
>> digestable at
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> J.A. Terranson wrote:
> >
> > I have a long running MM with three public lists in it. One of
> >them is archived, and two of them are not. i noticed today that the
> >*non-archived* lists have attachments stored (gigs of them) under:
> >
> >~mail
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
> I have a long running MM with three public lists in it. One of
>them is archived, and two of them are not. i noticed today that the
>*non-archived* lists have attachments stored (gigs of them) under:
>
>~mailman/logs/archives.old//attachments///attachment.html
>
Greetings, Redux. :-)
I have a long running MM with three public lists in it. One of
them is archived, and two of them are not. i noticed today that the
*non-archived* lists have attachments stored (gigs of them) under:
~mailman/logs/archives.old//attachments///attachment.html
It do
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > IMHO, some options (in order of my desirability)...
> > radio buttons to select regexp or glob behavior (default to glob?)
> > text around the box that says "it's a regexp"
> > make the search use a glob
>
> I tend to agree that "normal" users think o
On May 15, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mark Sapiro :
Charles Gregory wrote:
Has anyone ever developed a point-n-click tool to delete
a message from an archive, preferably by just eliminating the
From/To/Subject and body, but leaving the links intact, with
a placeholder message
* Mark Sapiro :
> Charles Gregory wrote:
> >
> >Has anyone ever developed a point-n-click tool to delete
> >a message from an archive, preferably by just eliminating the
> >From/To/Subject and body, but leaving the links intact, with
> >a placeholder message that says "message content removed", et
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
One issue is the tool wouldn't be so simple. You can't just edit the
HTML article because if that's all you do, the content will return if
you ever rebuilt the archive. The content is in 3 or 4 places - the
LISTNAME.mbox/LISTNAME.mbox raw archive, the HTML
On May 15, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9Barry Warsaw wrote:
I tend to agree that "normal" users think of globs instead of
regexps. Unfortunately, there's no good non-filesystem glob module
in Python that I know of. Ideally, there'd be a m
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I tend to agree that "normal" users think of globs instead of
> regexps. Unfortunately, there's no good non-filesystem glob module
> in Python that I know of. Ideally, there'd be a module that
> translates globs to regexps. That might not be too hard.
Would fnmatch.transla
On May 15, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
I've run into this with countless applications- the programmer uses
a regexp since it's so powerful, but the user expects to enter
"zba*" and get everything starting with "zba". Ditto on not finding
something you can see in a listing. Rememb
J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Please let me know specifically what you would like to see instead.
Really, I'd prefer a button to select from regex or text search. That
aside, a note at the top of the box stating this is *not* a text search,
see "help" for mor
Charles Gregory wrote:
>
>Has anyone ever developed a point-n-click tool to delete
>a message from an archive, preferably by just eliminating the
>From/To/Subject and body, but leaving the links intact, with
>a placeholder message that says "message content removed", etc?
Not as far as I know.
Has anyone ever developed a point-n-click tool to delete
a message from an archive, preferably by just eliminating the
From/To/Subject and body, but leaving the links intact, with
a placeholder message that says "message content removed", etc?
I found lots of FAQ's and posts on the 'manual' wa
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> J.A. Terranson wrote:
> >
> >On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >
> >> >a subscriber of the "tagged" form:
> >> >
> >> > lists_s+sp...@example.com
> >> >
> >> >does not get found on the subscriber search box. It works fine, and is
> >> >seen on
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> >a subscriber of the "tagged" form:
>> >
>> >lists_s+sp...@example.com
>> >
>> >does not get found on the subscriber search box. It works fine, and is
>> >seen on the "L" subscribers page, but it cannot be found via search
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >a subscriber of the "tagged" form:
> >
> > lists_s+sp...@example.com
> >
> >does not get found on the subscriber search box. It works fine, and is
> >seen on the "L" subscribers page, but it cannot be found via search
> >(likely special characters
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>a subscriber of the "tagged" form:
>
> lists_s+sp...@example.com
>
>does not get found on the subscriber search box. It works fine, and is
>seen on the "L" subscribers page, but it cannot be found via search
>(likely special characters).
This is not a bug.
The e
Greetings.
a subscriber of the "tagged" form:
lists_s+sp...@example.com
does not get found on the subscriber search box. It works fine, and is
seen on the "L" subscribers page, but it cannot be found via search
(likely special characters).
FYI :-)
//Alif
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
s
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:14:31PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Mark Sapiro writes:
>
> > As an aside to the original question, I think the MIME structure
> >
> > multipart/related
> > multipart/alternative
> > text/plain
> > text/html
> > image/jpeg
> >
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
