Re: [Mailman-Users] Display Real Name in Subscriber List

From: Mark Sapiro Jan Steinman wrote: Mark, any chance of this getting in the regular distribution, perhaps controlled by a config switch? I'll put it in 2.2. Wow, thanks! The Earth isn't a pizza. You can't dial up and have one delivered! -- Alf Jan Steinman

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman python-2.4 using 96% cpu

Goodman, William wrote: >Cool Mike that helped a lot... It's Mark ... >I was so frustrated I set it to: > >QRUNNER_SLEEP_TIME = seconds(10) > >That seem to calm it down a bit. > >top - 18:38:02 up 56 min, 2 users, load average: 1.25, 1.20, 1.83 >Tasks: 109 total, 1 running, 108 sleeping,

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman python-2.4 using 96% cpu

Cool Mike that helped a lot... I was so frustrated I set it to: QRUNNER_SLEEP_TIME = seconds(10) That seem to calm it down a bit. top - 18:38:02 up 56 min, 2 users, load average: 1.25, 1.20, 1.83 Tasks: 109 total, 1 running, 108 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 20.3%us, 0.3%sy, 0

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman python-2.4 using 96% cpu

Goodman, William wrote: >Sorry to say Mike this is after applying all patches... but it now >archiving OK. That's good. >top - 16:33:18 up 1 day, 23:08, 2 users, load average: 2.87, 2.24, >1.32 >Tasks: 106 total, 3 running, 103 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie >Cpu(s): 58.7%us, 3.5%sy,

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman python-2.4 using 96% cpu

Sorry to say Mike this is after applying all patches... but it now archiving top - 16:33:18 up 1 day, 23:08, 2 users, load average: 2.87, 2.24, 1.32 Tasks: 106 total, 3 running, 103 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 58.7%us, 3.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 37.4%id, 0.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st

Re: [Mailman-Users] Display Real Name in Subscriber List

Jan Steinman wrote: > >Mark, any chance of this getting in the regular distribution, perhaps >controlled by a config switch? I'll put it in 2.2. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.12rc2 released.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am happy to announce the second release candidate of Mailman 2.1.12. Since 2.1.12rc1 there have been a few bug fixes and updates to the Dutch and Catalan translations. Mailman 2.1.12 is a minor bug fix and Python 2.6 compatibility release. The min

Re: [Mailman-Users] Display Real Name in Subscriber List

From: Martin Schütte Wyn schrieb: Has any one any ideas how to display a real name next to the email address in Subscriber List I found the required change to be small enough and use the following code: --- Mailman/HTMLFormatter.py.oldMon Mar 12 23:25:34 2007 +++ Mailman/HTMLFor

Re: [Mailman-Users] Linux Preferred?

On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:47:39AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Tim Ferguson wrote: >> unfortunately I've not found a way to get to Mailman admin or other >> web interfaces using the "normal" URL's or those that worked in >> UBuntu. Any ideas on where I should look, please? > > In your web server

Re: [Mailman-Users] Linux Preferred?

Tim Ferguson wrote: >Along those lines, and since SuSE was mentioned,I've just installed a SuSE >Linux Server 10 and let it install Mailman among other applications. It >reported that the install was a success, but unfortunately I've not found a >way to get to Mailman admin or other web interf

Re: [Mailman-Users] Linux Preferred?

Along those lines, and since SuSE was mentioned,I've just installed a SuSE Linux Server 10 and let it install Mailman among other applications. It reported that the install was a success, but unfortunately I've not found a way to get to Mailman admin or other web interfaces using the "normal" U

Re: [Mailman-Users] Need help with archiving and the Reply to: fails

Goodman, William wrote: >Hello I think these issues are related: They aren't. >First after moving my lists server all basic functions work, however the >list server is not archiving, even when I select daily. As mentioned in the 96% cpu thread at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Windows mobile

Guillermo Guerra wrote: >I have four mailing lists running under mailman, in all of them users that >check their mail with windows mobile messaging complain that they cannot read >the messages sent to the list, they see the body of the messages empty and >with unreadable attachments.. See the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Linux Preferred?

In a flurry of recycled electrons, Barry Finkel wrote: > Do you know what changes to the source, if any, were made by FreeBSD? You can see the entire set at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/mailman/, look in the files dir. The reality is that there are very few changes, and most

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman python-2.4 using 96% cpu

Hi Mike, Theses are the high cpu grabbers: mailman 4764 4751 74 Feb04 ?17:00:03 /usr/bin/python2.4 /opt/software/mailman/bin/qrunner --runner=IncomingRunner:0:1 -s UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD mailman 4766 4751 22 Feb04 ?05:08:33 /usr/bin/python2.4 /o

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman python-2.4 using 96% cpu

What release did you upgrade from? >From 2.1.7 to 2.1.12rc1 What's in Mailman's logs? snipet from bounce: Feb 05 13:48:17 2009 (4760) gme_conference: bounce message w/no discernable addresses: <200902051848.n15imfx1011...@independence.tigr.org> Feb 05 13:48:17 2009 (4760) gme_conference: forwardin

[Mailman-Users] Need help with archiving and the Reply to: fails

Hello I think these issues are related: First after moving my lists server all basic functions work, however the list server is not archiving, even when I select daily. This is most likely because users cannot reply because they get bounced with: Your message did not reach some or all of the in

[Mailman-Users] Windows mobile

I have four mailing lists running under mailman, in all of them users that check their mail with windows mobile messaging complain that they cannot read the messages sent to the list, they see the body of the messages empty and with unreadable attachments.. Anybody with the same issue? Guiller

Re: [Mailman-Users] Linux Preferred?

On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:13 AM, Brad Knowles wrote: >> On another site I help administer, FreeBSD works just fine. But >> again, I run the version from our source and not the "ports" version. Jeffrey Goldberg replied: >I have found that using the FreeBSD ports system installation of >Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Linux Preferred?

On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:13 AM, Brad Knowles wrote: On another site I help administer, FreeBSD works just fine. But again, I run the version from our source and not the "ports" version. I have found that using the FreeBSD ports system installation of Mailman is just fine. When I first starte