on 1/27/09 9:07 AM, Tim Ferguson said:
Is there a preferred flavor of Linux that Mailman seems to work and
install the best with? I'm trying Ubuntu, but the apt-get feature is
getting hung up on trying to find the repositories and can't, so,
until I get that fixed I just thought I'd ask.
If y
on 1/27/09 10:40 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby said:
I meant subcribing a list to another list.
I dont know why they want to, but they just want...
Umbrella lists do this, but they don't exactly work the way you would
think they work, and unless you have a decent idea of what you're doing
and
Is there a preferred flavor of Linux that Mailman seems to work and install the
best with? I'm trying Ubuntu, but the apt-get feature is getting hung up on
trying to find the repositories and can't, so, until I get that fixed I just
thought I'd ask.
Thanks for any ideas and suggestions,
Ti
Mark Sapiro wrote:
What would be the surprising effects if I subscribe a list to a list?
It's just a customer whish, and I never did it and wonder what could
happen...
Why do they want to do this?
There is loop protection,
I meant subcribing a list to another list.
I dont know why they want t
It was easy enough to tweak settings so that messages sent
in HTML are distributed to a list as HTML, including embedded
images.
But I'm not clear, after googling around the Mailman-Users
archives and checking the FAQs, how to have the same effect
when a list's archives are browsed.
Where a mult
Are there Internet repositories of Mailman scripts and customization
beyond what comes with the distribution?
I keep having ideas for obvious capabilities that are missing, e.g.,
- an inverse of add_members (instead of an input file of users
to add to a single list, have an input file of lists t
At 08:54 AM 1/27/2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Kirke Johnson wrote:
(-- snip --)
If bounce_you_are_disabled_warnings is 0, cron/disabled is not involved
in removing the bouncing member. The member should be removed
immediately. The fact that you received an unsubscribed notice and the
subsequent m
Hello,
I have a postfix server running which can handle mail for 3 domains
via "virtual mailbox domains".
Now I want to use mailman to offer mailinglists for those 3 domains.
I read the documentation and found
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-install/postfix-virtual.html
but this seems o
On 01/27/09 13:19, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
It is not a misconfiguration of a MTA for for the envelope sender to
be of the form "@.." as long as this is a
working address.
Agreed. I was referring to the common question on MTA support lists
along the lines of "Why is sending emails out as
'@.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:51:48PM -0600, Barry Finkel wrote:
> I was surprised to learn last week that RFC 2822 has been made
> obsolete by RFC 5322, and 2821 by 5321. I think that the major
> changes wre to clear up sections where there were differences of
> interpretation.
I saw the update/obs
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:25 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> Though I think that the MTA sending out as
> @.. is a mis-configuration on the MTA's part.
It should be noted as well that it's not the MTA's job to set the
envelope sender address, nor is there any configuration in a proper MTA
to default
>Please see Sec. 3.6 of RFC 2822 for a full discussion of various e-mail
>header fields and their proper uses and meanings, and RFC 2821 for a
>discussion of the trace fields, such as Return-Path. It is not a
>misconfiguration of a MTA for for the envelope sender to be of the form
>"@.." as long a
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:25 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I can see how altering your From (depending on where you are sending to)
> could be a possibility. Though I think that the MTA sending out as
> @.. is a mis-configuration on the MTA's part.
> As far as the Sender: header, I can see that,
Mordur Ingolfsson wrote:
>
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> Did you restart Mailman after making that change in mm_cfg.py?
>>
>>
>Yes, I did. Adding this to mm_cfg.pydid induce some change. Before the
>advent of these lines some users got the accented letters in their
>direct, non-digest mail all garb
Kirke Johnson wrote:
>I have been attempting to test out the bounce processing on a test
>list and am confused by the results so far. We are running Mailman
>2.1.9 on RHEL, installed with the OS.
>
>The test list (tsstst) has the following settings:
>
>bounce_score_threshold: 1.0 (originally 5.0
john espiro wrote:
>On the web interface, every day, the ownership for config.ock gets changed:
>
>/var/lib/mailman/lists/MYLIST/config.pck gets set to mailman:mailman, while
>all other files and fodlers remain webadmin:mailman.
When ever the list is updated, the process creates a new, temporar
On 01/26/09 21:13, Brad Knowles wrote:
Even if they were infected with malware, those programs could easily use
a different outbound route than the normal mail sent by that person. So,
such a test might turn up something interesting, but then again it
doesn't prove anything if it doesn't.
Agr
On 01/26/09 20:30, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Sure. Anybody who uses a single host to send mail but alters their
From according to the venue (me, for example). Anybody whose MTA
identifies the envelope sender as u...@actual-host.example.com, but
whose MUA identifies them as u...@example.com i
Kirke Johnson wrote:
>I have been attempting to test out the bounce processing on a test
>list and am confused by the results so far. We are running Mailman
>2.1.9 on RHEL, installed with the OS.
>
>The test list (tsstst) has the following settings:
>
>bounce_score_threshold: 1.0 (originally 5.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Mordur Ingolfsson wrote:
>
>
>> Hi, thanks for your reply Mr. Sapiro. I had already tried this:
>>
>>
>> # CODE ###
>> def _(s):
>>return s
>>
>> add_language('en',_('English (USA)'), 'iso-8859-1')
>>
>> del _
>> # CODE
>
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 16:03 -0600, Barry Finkel wrote:
>> We had a case last week when someone sent mail with a spoofed
>>
>> "From: "
>>
>> line that contained the e-mail address of the list owner.
I also wrote:
>> In our case, the list owner temporarily moderated his e-mail address.
21 matches
Mail list logo
