Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>And this is just wierd. The KeyError above should cause the message to
>be shunted and that should be it. Why are we still processing the
>pipeline and what's in the pipeline that has no process attribute?
>(rhetorical question)
>
>
>>Nov 25 10:32:19 2008 (32088) SHUNTING:
>>1
Craig Kelley wrote:
>
>After upgrading to 2.1.11, all email is being "shunted" with this error
>message:
>
>v 25 10:32:19 2008 (3944) Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 120, in _oneloop
>self._onefile(msg, msgdata)
> File "/usr/local/
Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
>Hi, I did my due diligence and scoured the interwebs for a solution to
>my "problem", and came across this:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg24698.html
>
>This is a response to someone who wanted to do what I want to do: I'd
>like no attachment
Wow, thanks, that was easy and saved a lot of time.
Cheers,
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. November 2008 04:58
An: Singbartl, Thomas; mailman-users@python.org
Betreff: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mass update settings of multiple l
Hello Everyone;
After upgrading to 2.1.11, all email is being "shunted" with this error message:
v 25 10:32:19 2008 (3944) Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 120, in _oneloop
self._onefile(msg, msgdata)
File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailm
Hi, I did my due diligence and scoured the interwebs for a solution to
my "problem", and came across this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg24698.html
This is a response to someone who wanted to do what I want to do: I'd
like no attachments to go out to the list via email b
Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>I have lots of problems with out-of-office replies. I tried to set up a few
>filter rules using 2.1.10. Unfortuantely they don't catch them. Are the
>expressions case sensitiv? Are the expressions basic or extended?
>
>What I tried yet:
>
>^subject:.*Accepted.*
>^subjec
Hi,
I have lots of problems with out-of-office replies. I tried to set up a few
filter rules using 2.1.10. Unfortuantely they don't catch them. Are the
expressions case sensitiv? Are the expressions basic or extended?
What I tried yet:
^subject:.*Accepted.*
^subject:.*Declined.*
^subject:.*i
