on 11/20/08 1:37 AM, Grant Taylor said:
If my logic is correct, it should be the last server (Received: header
closest to the top of the message) that received the message that was
not duplicated. If the two examples share one Received: header and then
subsequent (closer to the top) are diffe
On 11/20/2008 01:28 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Not inherently, no. But that feature could be added.
*nod*
That's also a good idea, although not currently available in the
existing code.
*nod*
Call them before SpamBayes, I think.
Agreed.
I don't know for sure, but I'm betting that SpamBay
On 11/20/2008 01:33 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Have you seen several sample messages, so that you can do a comparison
and contrast between the supposed duplicates? In my experience, when
you look closely at the Received: headers, you usually find that the two
messages are literally identical with
on 11/19/08 11:16 PM, BROOKS WILLIAMS said:
We have subscribers on earthlink.com who receive multiple copies of
postings. Has anyone else had this problem? I saw a posting about it from
2003 but there was no solution given.
What is in your MTA logs? What is in their MTA logs?
Have you seen s
On 11/19/2008 11:16 PM, BROOKS WILLIAMS wrote:
We have subscribers on earthlink.com who receive multiple copies of
postings. Has anyone else had this problem? I saw a posting about it
from 2003 but there was no solution given.
Check your MTA logs and see if Mailman its self is sending duplicat
Hi,
We have subscribers on earthlink.com who receive multiple copies of
postings. Has anyone else had this problem? I saw a posting about it from
2003 but there was no solution given.
Thanks,
Brooks
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@py
on 11/20/08 12:54 AM, Grant Taylor said:
2) Does gate_news have the ability to filter (gateway or not) messages
based on the contents of the Path: header in the Usenet message?
Not inherently, no. But that feature could be added.
3) Is it possible to have gate_news call some of the other f
On 11/19/2008 03:26 PM, Johnny Stork wrote:
Other than placing a link on the mailing list signup page to an
"Acceptable Use Policy" is there any way to "force" the use of such a
policy before people can sign up for a mailing list in mailman? What I
mean by "force" is something where they need t
is probably another small bug somewhere in Mailman in how
it handles / folds lines of text. Format=flowed (my preference) suffers
equally in older versions of Mailman.
http://myDomain.com/cgi-bin/mailman/private/myListname/attachments/200=
81119/d1fa80ed/test.pdf
But this works:
http://myD
On 11/17/2008 11:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still haven't figured out quite how to solve the problem. In
theory we could use some other tool to perform the gateway operation.
Instead of passing Usenet postings directly to Mailman it would mail
them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where they would
On 11/18/2008 02:09 PM, Jewel wrote:
I know it's not a gmail problem because it's happening with so many
lists. I did notice that my CPU is almost always at 100% due to python -
don't know why. I know my machine is spitting out lots of mail but
cannot figure out what there is such a delay.
W
On 11/18/2008 12:14 PM, Jewel wrote:
*My smtp-failure and error logs are not helping me determine what's
wrong. Whenever I post a test to any list so far it always gets
delivered. But I have a few users who said they have tried several times
and don't see anything. I had one woman try again th
A quick note to all three of you who responded with the lsof suggestion.
Thank you! The first time I saw the lsof suggestion I wanted to kick
myself in the back of the head! It's been *so* long since I've had any
need, that I had simply forgotten all about it. It appears that it is no
longe
D G Teed wrote:
>
>If this is called "queries.py", then you can use the following command to
>list all unmoderated members of a mailing list:
>
>withlist -r queries.unmoderated LISTNAME
>
>Note that the file queries.py must be located in the home directory
>of mailman (not in bin).
The above stat
J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
J.A. Terranson wrote:
I have looked through the archives for something similar to my
issue, and I noticed that by searching on "disk full", I get similar
reports beginning in roughly July of 08.
As with these other reports, I h
J.A. Terranson writes:
> It feels like Im writing a file that I cannot see, but I dont think
> this is physically possible (anyone know otherwise?).
Oh, indeed it is possible, and happens with log files all the time.
All you need to do is start a process that doesn't close its logfile
until it
I worked up a straightforward patch for gate_news which adds SpamBayes
support to that program. This allows incoming Usenet news postings to be
checked for spam before foisting them off on unsuspecting mailing list
folks.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/300176
I've yet to figure out
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> J.A. Terranson wrote:
> >
> > I have looked through the archives for something similar to my
> >issue, and I noticed that by searching on "disk full", I get similar
> >reports beginning in roughly July of 08.
> >
> > As with these other reports,
Other than placing a link on the mailing list signup page to an
"Acceptable Use Policy" is there any way to "force" the use of such a
policy before people can sign up for a mailing list in mailman? What I
mean by "force" is something where they need to at least scroll down to
the bottom of an A
I have been running a mailing list which now requires a name change. I
have created the new list and so was wondering if there is some way to
move all the old archives to the new list? They are on the same
server/domain, but have different names now?
--
Johnny Stork
Open Enterprise Solutio
> There have been many changes in Scrubber.py (the module which does
> this) since 2.1.5. I will look into it, but I don't know if I will be
> able to duplicate the problem.
For what it's worth Mark, I copied a Scrubber.py from a Version 2.19 on
the wild chance that it might do some good - but a
Here is a solution I received from Jerry Stratton using withlist command
from the command line...
Create a file to use with "withlist".
==snip=
from Mailman import mm_cfg
def unmoderated(mlist):
memberCount = 0
for member in mlist.getMembers():
I am wanting to rebuild an archive but when I issue the following
command either as mailman or root:
bin/arch --wipe mylist
/usr/local/mailman/archives/private/mylist.mbox/mylist.mbox
I get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./arch", line 200, in ?
main()
File
Vikram Goyal wrote:
>
>I manage three announcement only lists. I had some issues with the server
>they were running on, because of which, I had to restart the server.
>However, since starting the server, I can't seem to be able to send any
>mails to any of the three lists.
>
>
>
>I checked the mai
Mark Dale wrote:
>
>In answer to your questions ...
>
>I am using Mailman version: 2.1.5
>
>Subscribers can choose digest if they want.
>
>The link is broken in the digest messages, just like in the archive.
>
>The broken link happens for every PDF file, even though the PDF arrives
>with the email.
Sean Murphy wrote:
>Mailman used to send me an email as the "site admin" that a new list has
>been created. I use the web interface to create new lists. This email
>had the aliases I needed to add to the /etc/mail/aliases file in the
>body of the email. I have upgraded Mailman months ago bu
Howdy,
We have some moderated lists with thousands of members
and a handful of people are appointed rights to post to it
(who are also members).
Periodically we don't know who has that posting
right, and someone asks for a list of those who can post.
How can this be queried?
--Donald
---
27 matches
Mail list logo
