Re: [Mailman-Users] subscription approval... apologies

Hello again, I jumped the gun when communicating with my client. The client is not highly skilled in IT and appears to have mixed up a normal post attempt with a subscription request. Looking through the logs and testing the behavior with a test list confirms that approving subscription requests

Re: [Mailman-Users] massive unsubscribe

Cyndi Norwitz wrote: >I've double checked records and it turns out that for every single >person who was unsubscribed there was a notice to me that their email >was bouncing (normal sorts of bouncing, nothing indicating spam). > >It can take months for the bounce to translate to an unsubscribe

[Mailman-Users] subscription approval

Hello, We have a client with a moderated (one-way) list where subscription requires approval of the owner. When the owner uses the web interface to approve this subscription request the original subscription email is also sent to the whole list (so, you get a blank email from the new subscriber

Re: [Mailman-Users] (pipermail versus ...) To join aconversationfromthe web interface

Edward Harvey wrote: Not sure how much of this you like / agree with, but here's an example of how I like to obscure things like that: http://nedharvey.com/pipermailconfig.html Thanks for the suggestion. One comment on your page - I don't think the list reply mailto should be

Re: [Mailman-Users] Availability of patches on Launchpad

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 24, 2008, at 7:31 PM, Lloyd F. Tennison wrote: Do we have any idea yet when this will be done? It would be nice to find the patches. The SF trackers have been re-enabled. There's no way to make them read-only so please switch to the L

Re: [Mailman-Users] Availability of patches on Launchpad

Do we have any idea yet when this will be done? It would be nice to find the patches. I am especially looking for the one that allows html footers to use it to solve the AOL problem that no one either knows how or volunteered to write a script to gather the redacted ARF addresses from the mai

[Mailman-Users] massive unsubscribe

On Sep 17, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Tecru Info wrote: We are having a problem where half the email list is getting unsubscribed. Has this happened to anyone? The people did not unsubscribe themselves. Yes, this has happened to me. I run several lists with Mailman at the same ISP. One of the lis

Re: [Mailman-Users] migrating Mailman

Mark Sapiro wrote: >... See the FAQ at <> ... That should be ... See the FAQ at ... -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan -

Re: [Mailman-Users] migrating Mailman

Shambhu Sharma wrote: > > Thanks. I was able to migrate a mailing list >successfully. But i have one issue. Mailing list on server "A" is as " >listname_domain.com" but the real_name is "listname". After migration, i >tried to send one email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it went for mo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moving to a new server

RobG wrote: > >The version we have now was installed during the server setup, so it >lives in /usr/lib/mailman. > >I've moved over the various lists/ and data/ and other directories that >didn't already exist. I've run bin/check_perms -f to fix the >permissions. I updated our mm_cfg list with

Re: [Mailman-Users] massive unsubscribe

Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >* Tecru Info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Nothing out of the ordindary shows up in the log. The IP/domain name is >> not on any common blacklists... >> >> I am not sure what I am supposed to be checking for in the WIKI, I found >> very little on there about spam other than in

Re: [Mailman-Users] moving archives to different location

Radim Roska, IAESTE CVUT wrote: > >I use mailman version 2.1.10 patched with mhonarc and modinc patches. > >I'm trying to move archives to subdirectories. >e.g. >$base/archives/private/test >$base/archives/private/test.mbox >=> >$base/archives/private/sectionA/test >$base/archives/private/sectionA/

Re: [Mailman-Users] massive unsubscribe

* Tecru Info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nothing out of the ordindary shows up in the log. The IP/domain name is > not on any common blacklists... > > I am not sure what I am supposed to be checking for in the WIKI, I found > very little on there about spam other than installing spam assasin... > > I