Re: [Mailman-Users] massive unsubscribe

Happened to us when first started. Perhaps you massive subscribe most of them and the server techs support think you could possibly be doing bulk mailing. Regards, Emiliano -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.

Re: [Mailman-Users] bin/upgrade has been broken since 2.1.5 (orpossibly longer)

Knut Auvor Grythe wrote: >The _UpdateRecords function in ListAdmin.py is completely broken, and >has been since 2.1.5. There is a bugreport filed in 2004 at >https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/266106, and a patch for the >issue was included in march 2005. It seems the issue has gone unnoticed

Re: [Mailman-Users] Greetings .. and some Questions

At 1:21 PM -0400 9/17/08, Jeffrey Lake - Admin wrote: hello, I love MailMan .. but I am having some problems that I hope someone here can help with. I run a web-server that has MailMan installed by Cpanel. Most of my clients use MailMan in one way or another, as do I. What I need to do is fix

Re: [Mailman-Users] URLs error

faisal anif wrote: > >Hi, >a small thingy, when I log into the list admin web interface, when clicking > on any link I get the following: > http://http//www.mydomain.com/mailman/cgi-bin/mailman/admin/listname/members >notice that there's 2 http:'s in the beginning and: >".com/mailman/cgi-bin/ma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Admin interface for a single list misbehaving?

Christopher Waltham wrote: > >"Bug in Mailman version 2.1.10 > >We're sorry, we hit a bug! > >Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of >traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, >but the webmaster can find this information in the Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Greetings .. and some Questions

Jeffrey Lake - Admin wrote: > >I run a web-server that has MailMan installed by Cpanel. >Most of my clients use MailMan in one way or another, as do I. >What I need to do is fix a minor problem, >approximently half the URL's MailMan creates are missing the 'www' portion of >the >link, this causes

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old server settings applied to some lists

Anne Anderson wrote: > >So I looked at mm_cfg.py and Defaults.py and discovered these settings: > >In mm_cfg.py (last modified 2002-10-07): > >DEFAULT_HOST_NAME = 'mail.westmont.edu' >DEFAULT_URL = 'http://%s/mailman/' % DEFAULT_HOST_NAME > >This is correct. Remove the above two lines (depr

[Mailman-Users] Emails sent directly to "bounce" address

J.R. Constance writes: > Is there any way to filter these emails sent to the bounce address so > that if they are spam they just get discarded. Procmail, ClamAV, etc. You should be running such filters on all received mail. If you can't reconfigure the MTA to do this for some reason, the ad

[Mailman-Users] massive unsubscribe

Tecru Info writes: > We are having a problem where half the email list is getting > unsubscribed. Has this happened to anyone? The people did not > unsubscribe themselves. Things to check: (1) You have been (mis)identified as a spammer, and ISPs are bouncing your mail. This causes th

[Mailman-Users] Admin interface for a single list misbehaving?

Christopher Waltham writes: > I have a server with 873 lists (yes really!), but only one seems to be > misbehaving. Specifically, when you go to the admin web interface and > click on Membership Management, I get an error saying: > admin(5901): UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't deco

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old server settings applied to some lists

Anne, I just had cause to change a config setting for all lists we manage and found the instructions at http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030597 to be thorough and complete. good luck, ~c Anne Anderson wrote: Hello! I hope someone can help me fix s

[Mailman-Users] massive unsubscribe

We are having a problem where half the email list is getting unsubscribed. Has this happened to anyone? The people did not unsubscribe themselves. -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf

[Mailman-Users] URLs error

Hi, a small thingy, when I log into the list admin web interface, when clicking on any link I get the following: http://http//www.mydomain.com/mailman/cgi-bin/mailman/admin/listname/members notice that there's 2 http:'s in the beginning and: ".com/mailman/cgi-bin/mailman" .. so it gives me th

[Mailman-Users] Old server settings applied to some lists

Hello! I hope someone can help me fix some bad configuration. We am running mailman 2.1.9 here at Westmont College and we have hundreds of lists which have been set up over the last 10 years or so. In that time, we have had several different mail servers. We now use the name mail.westmont.ed

[Mailman-Users] Admin interface for a single list misbehaving?

I have a server with 873 lists (yes really!), but only one seems to be misbehaving. Specifically, when you go to the admin web interface and click on Membership Management, I get an error saying: "Bug in Mailman version 2.1.10 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this

[Mailman-Users] Greetings .. and some Questions

hello, I love MailMan .. but I am having some problems that I hope someone here can help with. I run a web-server that has MailMan installed by Cpanel. Most of my clients use MailMan in one way or another, as do I. What I need to do is fix a minor problem, approximently half the URL's MailMan cr

[Mailman-Users] Emails sent directly to "bounce" address

I have one list that has suddenly been receiving an increase in bounces, and in looking at the bounce emails they appear to be spam sent directly to the bounce address (ex. list1- [EMAIL PROTECTED]). From what I can see this email (with attachments, sometimes virus/trojans) then gets sent as

[Mailman-Users] bin/upgrade has been broken since 2.1.5 (or possibly longer)

The _UpdateRecords function in ListAdmin.py is completely broken, and has been since 2.1.5. There is a bugreport filed in 2004 at https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/266106, and a patch for the issue was included in march 2005. It seems the issue has gone unnoticed, though. Possibly because the