Re: [Mailman-Users] set up HTML form to feed into Mailman

Ed at JustBrits wrote: ><>be used to subscribe people to a list, rather than using the one on >>the mailman site for the list? >See FAQ 4.33 .>> > >Off the top of your head Mark, would that be viable in a cPanel situation?? Yes. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Mailman-Users] set up HTML form to feed into Mailman

the mailman site for the list? See FAQ 4.33 .>> Off the top of your head Mark, would that be viable in a cPanel situation?? Tnx, as always!! Ed -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Manually bouncing messages to a mailman list

Cristian Rigamonti wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:33:14AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> I don't yet understand why Mailman would discard the message, but I am >> able to duplicate the problem, so I will investigate further tomorrow. > >Thank you very much! Let me know if I can help you someh

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

On 8/14/08, Dragon wrote: Yes, but being on a shaky, leaky canoe ready to sink or capsize on top of a cesspool is still not a very nice place to be. Who said you had the luxury of being in a canoe? You're swimming in it, buddy. They're squatting somewhere above you, and you just hope that

Re: [Mailman-Users] Newsrunner infinite loop

Max Lanfranconi wrote: > >I have a mailman 2.1.11 installation running about 1000 mailing lists. >Each of them is bi-directionally gatewayed via NNTP. > >I have been hitting the following scenario: > >Email 'a' is made of a text body and email 'b' as a text attachment. Is the attachment Content-T

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

Brad Knowles wrote: On 8/14/08, David Gibbs wrote: Obviously ... I just mentioned it to show AOL's general perspective towards people who participate in the feedback loop program. Their attitude towards us is better than their attitude towards the rest of the effluent. At least we're floa

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

On 8/14/08, David Gibbs wrote: Obviously ... I just mentioned it to show AOL's general perspective towards people who participate in the feedback loop program. Their attitude towards us is better than their attitude towards the rest of the effluent. At least we're floating on top. -- Bra

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

On 8/14/08, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Care to share a picture of how it looks? No retard aoluser was able to send me a screenshot. Yet. It differs depending on which version of which client you're running on which platform. Is there a specific version you're looking for? -- Brad Knowles <[

Re: [Mailman-Users] set up HTML form to feed into Mailman

Dave, You mean instead of using the python driven web form that comes with mailman? You can create a front-end to the existing subscription processes using an html form that collects the necessary parameters and submits them to mailman via the form's ACTION=. Here are the required params: email,

Re: [Mailman-Users] set up HTML form to feed into Mailman

Dave Briggs wrote: > >How hard would it be to create an HTML form for a website which could >be used to subscribe people to a list, rather than using the one on >the mailman site for the list? See FAQ 4.33 . -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The highway

[Mailman-Users] set up HTML form to feed into Mailman

Hi all How hard would it be to create an HTML form for a website which could be used to subscribe people to a list, rather than using the one on the mailman site for the list? Thanks Dave Briggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.davepress.net | 07525 209589 --

Re: [Mailman-Users] changing Mailman layout

Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > >What something like that work or do I need to learn python? :) > >output.append(' 'content="text/html; charset=%s">' % charset) > >output.append(' 'content="text/html; charset=%s">' % charset >\n

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

Brad Knowles wrote: Yeah, but rate-limiting is nothing like having all your e-mail silently dropped on the floor. At least you're getting something through, and you usually know something about that fact. Obviously ... I just mentioned it to show AOL's general perspective towards people who