Re: [Mailman-Users] line returns missing

Also jumping in late on this thread. I've seen the same happen in the archives. For instance, this original message is not wrapped: but this reply to it wraps the quoted text from the first just fine:

[Mailman-Users] Periods in user email addresses rejected

Jay Deiman writes: > I just got mailman up and running with Postfix and everything has been > working perfectly except when someone tries to subscribe to the list > that has a period in the "user" portion of the address. For example: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] It gets rejected as an invalid emai

[Mailman-Users] Periods in user email addresses rejected

I just got mailman up and running with Postfix and everything has been working perfectly except when someone tries to subscribe to the list that has a period in the "user" portion of the address. For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It gets rejected as an invalid email address by the web interface.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Complaining Outlook users

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >To be honest, that's exactly what "on behalf of" means, anyway, so I >don't understand why there's a problem here unless Outlook defaults to >reply-to-Sender rather than reply-to-From. I've never used Outlook. I have no personal knowledge of this, but my impression i

Re: [Mailman-Users] line returns missing

Michael: I'm jumping into this thread midstream, but this comment caught my eye... Some supposedly full-featured MUAs, Outlook & Exchange, have been victims. Some of those (so called) full-features MUA's specifically merge lines together when they shouldn't be ... and it's not even related to