Re: [Mailman-Users] Size limit on messages sent to maillist

Bill Honneus wrote: > >Is there a way to configure the mailing list so that we can set our own >limits on message size and/or attachment size? I would like to set the >limit to 3MB. General Options -> max_message_size -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The highway is for gamblers, San F

[Mailman-Users] Size limit on messages sent to maillist

Hi, One of our list subscribers received the following message: Your mail to 'my-list' with the subject RE: [my-list] FW: registering application Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message body is too big: 157187 bytes with a limit

Re: [Mailman-Users] HELP

John Lieber wrote: >I recently moved to a new server. I did a new install, setup everything >and it's all working great. I went to import my 'old' member list via >the web interface, only I forgot to select the radio button to NOT >notify the members of their subscription. How do I kill the mai

[Mailman-Users] HELP

I recently moved to a new server. I did a new install, setup everything and it's all working great. I went to import my 'old' member list via the web interface, only I forgot to select the radio button to NOT notify the members of their subscription. How do I kill the mail that is trying to be s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Admin and email

Melinda Gilmore wrote: >I have screwed up my mailman somehow that when I sent an email to a >individual account on the server (spot) the mail is going to me (gilmore.126 >instead of the spot account. Is it possible there is some mailman config >that you can change an address that this could have

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce processing questions (feature, or bug?)

Barry Finkel writes: > Hank van Cleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, in part, > It seems to me that > > stat=Service unavailable > > means that the inbound mailer is not available at the moment. The problem that we're facing is that there are a few people who don't think[1] that the RFC

[Mailman-Users] Admin and email

I have screwed up my mailman somehow that when I sent an email to a individual account on the server (spot) the mail is going to me (gilmore.126 instead of the spot account. Is it possible there is some mailman config that you can change an address that this could have happened. I know I was foo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

Charles Marcus wrote: I was talking about your cute little remark about giving someone a FIREARM so that they could 'come demonstrate to me the danger their deear departed one faced'. I said I wouldn't do it. So there's no threat there. That chip on your shoulder is getting pretty heavy, i

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . Also it seems clicking reply on a msg here does a off list reply. So all my previous reply`s were done off list. I just wanted to say I did not mean to start a header war here. What I meant was I should have looked more closely where my reply was going and fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

On 6/20/2008, Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: It wasn't a threat. It was a statement of fact -- continued arguing with us on a subject considered long since dead is likely to have results that you're probably not going to like. I was talking about your cute little remark about giving s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

Charles Marcus wrote: I am *not* arguing for changing the default - whatever gave you that idea? You may say that, but then virtually everything else you wrote was in strong, even violent, support of changing the default. So, what am I supposed to believe -- the tiny little disclaimer,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

On 6/20/2008 1:27 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: Charles Marcus wrote: You replied on list, so I will too... Not really a very wise idea. Really. Well, I had started to reply point by point until it became obvious that you are confused about something... Read the following carefully... **

Re: [Mailman-Users] statics

Jesús Rivas wrote: anyone have a statics of how many message per hour send. a like to migrate to mailman but i need static for that Search the Mailman FAQ for "statistics". The shortcut URL for the FAQ is . -- Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> LinkedIn Profile: <

Re: [Mailman-Users] moderate to sender?

Karen R McArthur wrote: If a person is a member of a certain List (Staff, for example) and sends a message which may need moderation - is there a way to send that SENDER the moderator message instead of the administrator or moderator? The purpose of this that we want some of our constituencie

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

Charles Marcus wrote: You replied on list, so I will too... Not really a very wise idea. When I use my @python.org e-mail address (which I very rarely do), I speak from a position of a certain amount of authority on the subject. If you want to try to have a civilized private conversation

Re: [Mailman-Users] statics

Jesús Rivas wrote: >anyone have a statics of how many message per hour send. >a like to migrate to mailman but i need static for that This depends much more on the outgoing MTA, your DNS configuration and the bandwidth of your internet connection than on Mailman, but see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Options for increasing throughput

Fletcher Cocquyt wrote: Hi, I am observing periods of qfiles/in backlogs in the 400-600 message count range that take 1-2hours to clear with the standard Mailman 2.1.9 + Spamassassin (the vette log shows these messages process in an avg of ~10 seconds each) Search the FAQ for performance. The

Re: [Mailman-Users] moderate to sender?

Karen R McArthur wrote: >If a person is a member of a certain List (Staff, for example) and sends >a message which may need moderation - is there a way to send that SENDER >the moderator message instead of the administrator or moderator? The >purpose of this that we want some of our constituen

[Mailman-Users] statics

anyone have a statics of how many message per hour send. a like to migrate to mailman but i need static for that thanks -- Saludos!!! Jesus Alonso Rivas Sistemas _ Evangelización Activa Comunicación Digital al Servicio del Evangelio www.evangelizacion.org.m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Options for increasing throughput

Fletcher Cocquyt wrote: >Hi, I am observing periods of qfiles/in backlogs in the 400-600 message >count range that take 1-2hours to clear with the standard Mailman 2.1.9 + >Spamassassin (the vette log shows these messages process in an avg of ~10 >seconds each) Is Spamassassin invoked from Mailm

[Mailman-Users] moderate to sender?

If a person is a member of a certain List (Staff, for example) and sends a message which may need moderation - is there a way to send that SENDER the moderator message instead of the administrator or moderator? The purpose of this that we want some of our constituencies to be able to diagnose

Re: [Mailman-Users] Authorization required with FireFox 3

Sascha Schmidt wrote: > >thanks for your replies. > >- I've deleted all cookies >- Cleared the browser-cache > >but to login at the password prompt does not work. I assume by "password prompt" you mean the admin and/or admindb login page. >BUT: Giving the password directly with the ?adminpw= ar

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

Allan Odgaard wrote: > >I use an anonymous remailer so personally wouldn’t work for me, plus >when people reply to me and cc the list, there are no list headers in >that message, even though it is a list message (one of the reasons >"reply to poster" sucks). If this is a problem for you, se

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

Charles Marcus wrote: > >*My* point was simply pointing out that there *is a preference setting* >in the Mailman GUI for changing this, so if someone *wants* to change >it, they obviously *can* - so what difference does the *default* make? There is also an mm_cfg.py setting to override the defa

[Mailman-Users] Calling all Mailman consultants

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everybody, I get asked all the time: will you set up my lists for pay? I'm not interested or able to do this kind of work, but I always feel bad about turning people away without some pointers to other people. I've started a wiki page for th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce processing questions (feature, or bug?)

Barry Finkel wrote: >Hank van Cleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, in part, > >> >>For the four days June 13-17, mail went verizon.net normally, >>dsn-2.0.0, stat=Sent >> >>Two Verizon users have contacted me and told me that they had received >>no mail from our list since the 11th; that they had co

Re: [Mailman-Users] GPLv3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 19, 2008, at 5:36 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: If you have a specific hardship with our adoption of GPLv3 for Mailman 2.2 and 3.0, please let me know. I may not be able to answer your questions, but we can bring in some official GNU and FSF

Re: [Mailman-Users] Muti-Mailman install

You replied on list, so I will too... but I will not respond to further arguments about it, since neither of us are likely to change our mind. On 6/19/2008, Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Whats the big deal anyway? If you want lists configured to reply to the list, just set it that way

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce processing questions (feature, or bug?)

Hank van Cleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, in part, >The background scenario is that I have been experiencing the "now you >see it/now you don't" big-consumer-internet mail service spam >blocking. This week it is Verizon.net. > >Basically, mail to verizon.net addresses failed and bounced for a 2

[Mailman-Users] Options for increasing throughput

Hi, I am observing periods of qfiles/in backlogs in the 400-600 message count range that take 1-2hours to clear with the standard Mailman 2.1.9 + Spamassassin (the vette log shows these messages process in an avg of ~10 seconds each) Is there an easy way to parallelize what looks like a single ser