Re: [Mailman-Users] mod-security rules?

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And what are mod-security rules? Mod-Security is an Apache module that can be used to prevent things like XSS and other strange/nefarious behavior. Mod-Security, as well as GotRoot, offers some rules supporting Mailman, an

Re: [Mailman-Users] mod-security rules?

On 6/5/08, Jim Popovitch wrote: Does anyone have any advice/examples for mod-security rules on a Mailman site? And what are mod-security rules? -- Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> LinkedIn Profile: -- Mailman-Use

[Mailman-Users] mod-security rules?

Does anyone have any advice/examples for mod-security rules on a Mailman site? Thx. -Jim P. -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/f

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with subscription confirmation string

Christopher Adams wrote: > >Yes, that is the exact string that is in the To: header of the reply. > >On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Christopher Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:31:21 -0700 >> To: mailman-users@python.org >> >

Re: [Mailman-Users] mail distro, newsgroup, or both?

On 3-Jun-08, at 2:02 PM, Laura Creighton wrote: In a message of Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:20:04 CDT, Brad Knowles writes: Do you mean Mailman mailing lists? The interface is exposed to third-party archivers, such as mhonarc, and there are other third-party index/ search tools that also can be relat

Re: [Mailman-Users] server load..

This a follow-up to a quite old posting on this list. I just read something on postfix-users and feel that it is relevant for this question. The OP wanted to deal with a larger mail volume: * Khalil Abbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi mailman guys .. my question is, I have a 100,000+ subscribers

[Mailman-Users] ETA for MM 3.0?

Jon Slater writes: > Does anyone have a guess-timate for the MM 3.0 release? Barry Warsaw is the person to ask directly, or on Mailman-Developers. It's definitely not something you want to hold your breath for; there's definitely plans for Mailman 2.2. --

[Mailman-Users] problem with subscription confirmation string

Christopher Adams writes: > If I send a message to test7-request and add the word 'subscribe', I get a > message back like this: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; on behalf of; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It looks to me like the '+' in the address (the part bracketed by '<>') has been

[Mailman-Users] ETA for MM 3.0?

Does anyone have a guess-timate for the MM 3.0 release? -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http:/

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual hosts and re-using list names

Jon, As our resident Mailman experts have stated - this is not a standard feature of the current versions. I don't know the release date for Version 3, but it was being talked about 2 years ago when I first started using Mailman I have gotten around this in the current 2.x versions by doing

Re: [Mailman-Users] default language per virtual host

> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:48:52 -0700 > From: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Perhaps you are thinking of password reminders which are sent in the > language determined by > > # If the person is on more than one list, it is possible that they > # have different preferred languages, and there's

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with subscription confirmation string

Yes, that is the exact string that is in the To: header of the reply. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:31:21 -0700 > To: mailman-users@python.org > > >I have previously had problems wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.10 .. yahoo says "domainkeys=fail (badsig)" ...

Bob001 wrote: So, how you all are exactly achieving post-signing of messages after REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS=Yes? That would be done in your MTA. Mailman has no involvement with this process. Do we have any documentation on what changes should be done on postfix/dkimproxy side for post-signing?

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.10 .. yahoo says "domainkeys=fail (badsig)" ...

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Bob001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, how you all are exactly achieving post-signing of messages after > REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS=Yes? I no longer am. :-) When I was, I was using Sendmail and dk-filter. BUT, in the end I determined that it was (IMHO) a waste of res

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual hosts and re-using list names

Jon Slater wrote: Is there a way to re-use list names for multiple virtual hosts without running multiple instances of MM? Not with the standard version of Mailman, no. See FAQ 4.47 at . -- Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> LinkedIn

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.10 .. yahoo says "domainkeys=fail (badsig)" ...

ah...i see. Thanks Jim for clarification. So, how you all are exactly achieving post-signing of messages after REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS=Yes? Any suggestions? We are on postfix and dkimproxy with mailman. Do we have any documentation on what changes should be done on postfix/dkimproxy side for post

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with subscription confirmation string

Christopher Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:31:21 -0700 To: mailman-users@python.org >I have previously had problems with this and since moving to a new server, >it doesn't seem to work quite right. > >I use Postfix. In my Postfix main.cf, I have a line: > >recipient_de

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.10 .. yahoo says "domainkeys=fail (badsig)" ...

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Bob001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Mark, > Thanks so much for the response and getting involved. > > Actually, we need keys so that yahoo doesn't consider emails as spam. That > was the main purpose of upgrading to 2.1.10 version of mailman. > > Any kind of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual hosts and re-using list names

Jon Slater wrote: > >Is there a way to re-use list names for multiple virtual hosts without >running multiple instances of MM? Not in standard Mailman 2.1.x. This will be addressed in Mailman 3. There are patches in the sourceforge tracker and cPanel's Mailman also supports this in a way. See

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.10 .. yahoo says "domainkeys=fail (badsig)" ...

Hello Mark, Thanks so much for the response and getting involved. Actually, we need keys so that yahoo doesn't consider emails as spam. That was the main purpose of upgrading to 2.1.10 version of mailman. Any kind of customization possible? Any insight would be of a great help. - Regards, Bob.

[Mailman-Users] problem with subscription confirmation string

I have previously had problems with this and since moving to a new server, it doesn't seem to work quite right. I use Postfix. In my Postfix main.cf, I have a line: recipient_delimiter = + In mm_cfg.py, I have this line: VERP_CONFIRMATIONS = Yes If I send a message to test7-request and add th

[Mailman-Users] Virtual hosts and re-using list names

Hi, Is there a way to re-use list names for multiple virtual hosts without running multiple instances of MM? For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the same server? So far, the only solution I've found it to be cleaver with my list names (like [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1.10 patch release, was: Subscription errors

Mark Sapiro wrote: >Duncan Drury wrote: >> >>Any chance of releasing a patched version of mailman as promised a while >>back? Not everyone using Mailman will be up to patching or manually editing >>the code, and like a I said - for me at least this bug was a showstopper - >>and a nasty one becaus

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.10 .. yahoo says "domainkeys=fail (badsig)" ...

bob 001 wrote: > >After upgrading to mailman 2.1.10, we were hoping for resolving the issue of >stripped keys. > >Although keys are not longer stripped, yahoo says domainkeys=fail (bad sig) >and gmail says "dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify)" > >Please note that, one to one email works fine a

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1.10 patch release, was: Subscription errors

Duncan Drury wrote: > >Any chance of releasing a patched version of mailman as promised a while >back? Not everyone using Mailman will be up to patching or manually editing >the code, and like a I said - for me at least this bug was a showstopper - >and a nasty one because it was pretty silent. H

Re: [Mailman-Users] Major problems with privacy and mailman lists and harvesters

Michael Welch writes: > Right, there's lots broken at Topica. But I sure do like the intent > of their obscuration technique. I don't. What they're obscuring is that it doesn't work. -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org htt