When creating archives for one of the lists I run (until recently
with another listserv software) I wrote a relatively simple
find/replace grep which replaces the domain names so that email
addresses become [EMAIL PROTECTED] In this case, the list itself is by
invitation only but the archives
Steve Murphy wrote at 10:03 AM 5/23/2008:
>I've noticed in the mailman-users archives, that if I view info by thread
>(using the mailman archives as an example,) which site is 2.1.10 based, that
>all email addresses are present, but with a simple obfuscation. (the "@" has
>been changed to " at
Hello, I am running Debian/etch and the user "list" has a Python process
which takes up 83.2% of my memory and has been running for more than 40
minutes.
My suspicion is that some sort of queue of moderator messages is very
large.
In fact, /var/lib/mailman/ is very large... I cannot access t
Steve Murphy wrote:
>I'm quite concerned about what I'm seeing in mailman installations, and
the amount of spam I've been getting >because I participate in mailman
based lists!
>What I'm concerned about is the fact that email harvesters are being
given so much information.
>I've noticed in the m
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Steve Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Within MINUTES of my first posting on asterisk-users, I was getting spam
> on an email address that was brand-new.
How do you know that it was your archived post that the spammers
picked up on?It is also possible that t
The acceptable number of recipients can be adjusted at:
http:///mailman/admin//privacy/recipient
Ceiling on acceptable number of recipients for a posting.
(Details for max_num_recipients)
Defaults to 10
At 8:48 AM -0700 5/23/08, Knabe, Troy wrote:
On 5/23/08 8:14 AM, "webct" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Steve Murphy wrote:
I've noticed in the mailman-users archives, that if I view info
by thread (using the mailman archives as an example,)
which site is 2.1.10 based,
that all email addresses are present, but with a simple obfuscation.
(the "@" has been changed to " at ".) I can't help but to t
Hi Steve. Thank you for your email, it is well researched and conveys your
point of view.
Your points on inconsistency in protecting email addresses in the archives
are interesting. Also, I am no lover of spammers.
That said, can you break down your suggestions to those relevant to the
inher
Hello!
I'm quite concerned about what I'm seeing in mailman installations,
and the amount of spam I've been getting because I participate in
mailman based lists!
I'm not talking about halting spam that gets submitted to the list
for mailing. I'm not talking about spambots automatically joining
th
On 5/23/08 8:14 AM, "webct" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We are using mailman which comes with Mac OS X server 10.5. I think,
I have set it up correctly for most of the part but there is one
lingering issue with sending a message with other email addresses.
I get "Recipient list too long" e
Hi,
We are using mailman which comes with Mac OS X server 10.5. I think,
I have set it up correctly for most of the part but there is one
lingering issue with sending a message with other email addresses.
I get "Recipient list too long" error message and the email is held
for moderator's
On April 23 Mark Sapiro wrote:
>| I am happy to announce the release of Mailman 2.1.10.
>
>
>I have discovered a few problems with the release. None is a major show
>stopper, but the most significant so far is that I broke cmd_subscribe
>so that email subscribe to the -subscribe or -join address o
12 matches
Mail list logo
