[Mailman-Users] content filtering and blank messages (again)

2008-05-17 Thread Russell Clemings
(Following up) The problem and the workaround appear to be the same as this: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq04.022.htp The system in this case is running CPanel 11.18.6 on CentOS 4.6. The only difference from the symptoms discussed in the FAQ is that the messages sent

Re: [Mailman-Users] A cluster issue I didn't find in the faq, or on google

2008-05-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Richard Nelson wrote: > >* on all but the original machine, http:///cgi-bin/(listinfo|admin)/ > says there are *no* public lists (when in fact there are several) >and > on the original machine, http:///cgi-bin/(listinfo|admin)/ > shows the full list The default setting VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW =

[Mailman-Users] A cluster issue I didn't find in the faq, or on google

2008-05-17 Thread Richard Nelson
Mailman: 2.1.10 Python: 2.5.2 Debian: Sid (unstable) Linux: 2.6.25.3 I've got a small cluster of machines doing smtp/web/etc. The storage is NFSv3, moving to NFSv4 as soon as I get a few more Kerberos issues squared away. To enable Mailman, I symlinked mailman/archives and mailman/lists to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Patches revised for MM 2.1.10

2008-05-17 Thread Karl Zander
On Sat, 17 May 2008 06:40:15 +0100 Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For anyone that uses them, I now have put MM 2.1.10 compatible versions of the various Mailman patches I maintain up on my web site at: http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/index.html Patches are as follows: Sourceforge P

Re: [Mailman-Users] Patches revised for MM 2.1.10

2008-05-17 Thread Brad Knowles
On 5/17/08, Richard Barrett wrote: For anyone that uses them, I now have put MM 2.1.10 compatible versions of the various Mailman patches I maintain up on my web site at: http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/index.html And I still have a dream that someday at least most of these patches will eith

Re: [Mailman-Users] Porting Issues

2008-05-17 Thread Brad Knowles
On 5/17/08, Bill Tenny-Brittian wrote: It worked great and spam dropped to virtually zero, but all our mailing lists stopped working. They weren't caught in our spam trap (we can see what's captured) . they simply didn't go through. We reopened the MX settings and all our listServ emails shu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Porting Issues

2008-05-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Bill Tenny-Brittian wrote: > >We're running mailman 2.1.9.cp2 on a Linux server. We set up with >PeertoPeer.net to filter our spam, which had become unmanageable. Because >some spammers were sending directly to our IP, we changed the MX settings to >go directly to PeerToPeer rather than through cPa

[Mailman-Users] Porting Issues

2008-05-17 Thread Bill Tenny-Brittian
Greetings. We're running mailman 2.1.9.cp2 on a Linux server. We set up with PeertoPeer.net to filter our spam, which had become unmanageable. Because some spammers were sending directly to our IP, we changed the MX settings to go directly to PeerToPeer rather than through cPanel (mx). In addit