On 3/21/08, Matt Morgan wrote:
> Are there corporate, enterprise spam-killing services that work on a
> user-by-user basis, rather than a message-by-message basis? For example,
> where the same message, sent to a few different people, might be rejected as
> spam for one recipient but not other
Matt Morgan wrote:
>
>Are there corporate, enterprise spam-killing services that work on a
>user-by-user basis, rather than a message-by-message basis? For example,
>where the same message, sent to a few different people, might be rejected as
>spam for one recipient but not others?
Yes.
--
Mark
--On Friday, March 21, 2008 8:50 PM -0400 Matt Morgan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there corporate, enterprise spam-killing services that work on a
> user-by-user basis, rather than a message-by-message basis? For example,
> where the same message, sent to a few different people, might be rej
This question is a little off-topic.
Are there corporate, enterprise spam-killing services that work on a
user-by-user basis, rather than a message-by-message basis? For example,
where the same message, sent to a few different people, might be rejected as
spam for one recipient but not others?
I'
Mark Heer wrote:
>
>I need to combine the archives into 1 for display on our web archive - which
>is on yet another machine
>running mailman but not the mx functions. I attempted /bin/arch --wipe
>listname but it did not re-order the list by time sent/proper sequence., it
>just reproduced the f
Hello,
We are moving from majordomo to mailan. We use 2 mail hubs to handle mail
service so mail can be handled by either machine which means some archive
entries for a particular list will end up on mx1 and other posts may end up in
the archives on mx2. I need to combine the archives into 1
Cyndi Norwitz wrote:
>
>What I'd like to do is set up a filter that scans the content of the body
>text for a phrase like: "FAIR USE NOTICE" or "Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107."
>I would like those caught posts to go into the moderation queque ("hold"
>not "reject" or "discard").
>An example is:
>h
My mailing lists have a policy of disallowing copyrighted material without
permission. I have a couple people on moderation who do not understand
this and post such things frequently. But I want to keep most folks off
moderation if possible as it improves the flow of the list and reduces my
workl
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Con Wieland wrote:
>
>>I don't understand why the body of this message was removed in the
>>archives. (I have removed the picture at the bottom to meet the lists
>>size requirement)
>>
>>http://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/public/visgrads/2008-March/000174.html
>
>
>The short
Carlos Corredor wrote:
>
>I have two lists. In one of them, I can add new members by mass subscription
>only - adding a member using the general list information page does not
>work: nothing happens - no response email of any kind, and of course, the
>user does not get subscribed. In the other lis
Hello again:
I have two lists. In one of them, I can add new members by mass subscription
only - adding a member using the general list information page does not
work: nothing happens - no response email of any kind, and of course, the
user does not get subscribed. In the other list, everything w
Con Wieland wrote:
>I don't understand why the body of this message was removed in the
>archives. (I have removed the picture at the bottom to meet the lists
>size requirement)
>
>http://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/public/visgrads/2008-March/000174.html
The short answer is Mailman 2.1.4
>From
I don't understand why the body of this message was removed in the
archives. (I have removed the picture at the bottom to meet the lists
size requirement)
http://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/public/visgrads/2008-March/000174.html
X-UCInetID: rjgeier
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.
13 matches
Mail list logo
