Re: [Mailman-Users] Pending messages disappeared from admindb

On 2/10/08, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > I think the whole site could use some reorganization. I had seen the > FAQ Wizard page before, but I have no idea how I got there. If I follow > the FAQ link in the left-hand nav panel, I get the old one. Barry Warsaw has suggested that the entire FAQ Wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pending messages disappeared from admindb

On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 18:52 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I updated the FAQ at > > to say not to change the heldmsg-* file names. > > The FAQ on renaming a list at and > mirrors is so out of date,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pending messages disappeared from admindb

I updated the FAQ at to say not to change the heldmsg-* file names. The FAQ on renaming a list at and mirrors is so out of date, I'm surprised you could follow it at all, but maybe we can change i

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pending messages disappeared from admindb

On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 17:11 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > > >At this point, all you can do is something like: > > > > bin/dumpdb data/heldmsg--nn.pck | sed -e 1,2d -e \$d |\ > > bin/inject -l > > > >to repost those messages you don't want to discard, and just remove the >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pending messages disappeared from admindb

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >At this point, all you can do is something like: > > bin/dumpdb data/heldmsg--nn.pck | sed -e 1,2d -e \$d |\ > bin/inject -l > >to repost those messages you don't want to discard, and just remove the >rest. BTW, after you do the above, you still need to eventually remov

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pending messages disappeared from admindb

Matthew Saltzman wrote: > >I was renaming a list according to the instructions in the FAQ. The >last step there refers to moving pending requests in the qfiles >directory, which doesn't appear to apply in 2.1.9. But in trying to >figure out if there was anything I did need to do, I renamed the >f

[Mailman-Users] Pending messages disappeared from admindb

I use mailman-2.1.9-2 from RHEL5. I was renaming a list according to the instructions in the FAQ. The last step there refers to moving pending requests in the qfiles directory, which doesn't appear to apply in 2.1.9. But in trying to figure out if there was anything I did need to do, I renamed t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: > >The confustion was the difference in ownership, some owner mailman >some root. Owner generally doesn't matter. It depends on who owned the process that created the file or directory in the first place. The important thing is group. Everything should be group 'mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Hi Mark Many thanks for the hotline! Ref: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10.02.2008 23:04 > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > >Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: > >> > >>withing OURLIST there is some confusion: > >>drwxrwsr-x 2 rootmailman 12288 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September/ > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 root

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Mark Sapiro wrote: >Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: >> >>withing OURLIST there is some confusion: >>drwxrwsr-x 2 rootmailman 12288 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September/ >>-rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 481377 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September.txt >>-rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 92418 2008-02-07 03:2

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: > >drwxrwsr-x 4 root mailman 4096 2007-11-11 15:30 archives// >drwxrwsr-x 2 root mailman 4096 2007-11-13 22:55 public/ Above are good. >interesting >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root mailman 43 2007-11-13 22:55 >/usr/local/mailman/archives/public/OURLIST -> >/usr/local/mailman/arc

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Hi Mark Ref: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10.02.2008 21:24 > Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: > > > >My Defaults.py set it correctly > >--- > >DEFAULT_ARCHIVE = On > >DEFAULT_ARCHIVE_PRIVATE = 0 > >ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX = 2 > >--- > > > >and not touched in mm_cfg.py. Does an explicite override in > >mm_cf

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: > >My Defaults.py set it correctly >--- >DEFAULT_ARCHIVE = On >DEFAULT_ARCHIVE_PRIVATE = 0 >ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX = 2 >--- > >and not touched in mm_cfg.py. Does an explicite override in >mm_cfg.py necessary? No. Perhaps there is a permissions problem. Try running bin/check_

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Hi Mark Ref: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10.02.2008 20:28 > > > >I did a "clean-up" in the server. Rather than starting qrunner, > >ArchRunner etc manually, /usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailman being > >now called with "start" as argument during boot. Mail delivery is OK > >but the archive is n

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: > >I did a "clean-up" in the server. Rather than starting qrunner, >ArchRunner etc manually, /usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailman being >now called with "start" as argument during boot. Mail delivery is OK >but the archive is not created automatically. I have to call >bi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

Hi Ref: Visvanath Ratnaweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04.02.2008 22:23 > > Ref: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04.02.2008 20:53 > > Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: > > > > > >The testmails are also delivered. But not archived. What could > > >be missing? > > > > > > Is ArchRunner running? > > That was

Re: [Mailman-Users] Signing up for a list

AD-ML wrote: > >I suspect [?subject=subscribe] is case-sensitive Only if the MUA that processes the mailto cares about the case of 'subject',and not all MUAs will even recognize the subject= fragment at all, but this is moot anyway - see below. >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">SUBSCRIBE > >Can this t