Hello again,
2008/1/25, Cyndi Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>From: Khalil Abbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:41:14 +
>
>Now this is the most logical and reasonale answer I've ever got .. this
>is what I call: a reply from a professional.. she's right, I have no
From: Khalil Abbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:41:14 +
Now this is the most logical and reasonale answer I've ever got .. this
is what I call: a reply from a professional.. she's right, I have no
idea that this is spamming.. all I know about spamming is those w
Now this is the most logical and reasonale answer I've ever got .. this is what
I call: a reply from a professional.. she's right, I have no idea that this is
spamming.. all I know about spamming is those who send you repeatedly every
once in a while, and all I wanna do is send a simple invite
On 1/24/08, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> However, I think it's perfectly appropriate to denounce spammers, and
> refuse to help them.
Speaking only for myself, if I discover that someone has actively
used Mailman to further their illegal and/or immoral spamming
activities, then I will take any and a
Matthew Farr wrote:
> Yes, the other lists are working.
>
> I can see some of these aliases in virtual-mailman and virtual-mailman.db --
> but there is a warning not to edit these files. Actually, one functioning
> list isn't in either of these files, which makes me think there is a
> separate ali
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 24, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Allan Hansen wrote:
> I agree, and it's not harsh enough.
>
> My first reaction to this was Oh-My-God.
>
> My second reaction was to think that we needed an agreement among
> Mailman list users that Mailman not be used f
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:31:48 -0800
From: Allan Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So I suppose that the best response is to simply ignore requests such as
this which so obviously is from a spammer.
I disagree. They shouldn't be ignored. They should be denounced.
Previous posters covered
I agree, and it's not harsh enough.
My first reaction to this was Oh-My-God.
My second reaction was to think that we needed an agreement among Mailman list
users that Mailman not be used for spam. Then I realized that that would only
inconvenience legit Mailman users and spammers would not care
Joakim Nömell wrote:
>
> If I change -owner to -own in the mm router in my exim.conf-file and
> change the above in MailList.py I got this log in exim:
>
> 2008-01-24 14:35:17 1JI2Ef-00011f-7q <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=localhost
> [127.0.0.1] P=esmtps X=TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32 S=856
> [E
AlxFrag wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i've been using mailman-2.1.9 about a year now without problems.
>
> I've set up a new mail server (postfix) and installed mailman again.
> I've succesfully created a new list called "mylist".
>
> But, if i try to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] postfix replies t
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2008/1/24, Khalil Abbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Hello mailman guys..
>>
>> ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily
>> newsletter.. I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want
>> to use to promote my website and
Dennis Putnam wrote:
> At 06:10 PM 1/21/2008, you wrote:
>
>> Somewhere, there is another test/backup/incompletely deleted/whatever
>> Mailman installation that is sending these. Check the Received: headers
>> of the message to see at which server it originates and then
>
> I'm not sure what you
Yes, the other lists are working.
I can see some of these aliases in virtual-mailman and virtual-mailman.db --
but there is a warning not to edit these files. Actually, one functioning
list isn't in either of these files, which makes me think there is a
separate aliases file elsewhere...
OK, same
Thanks for all the help guys! Embarrassingly, it was in fact a very
stupid configuration error. I completely forgot we used a mirror domain
for mailman (so it doesn't conflict with main virtual domain in postfix)
and a few weeks ago I made all domains redirect to the main domain in
apache confi
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Khalil Abbas wrote:
> ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily
>newsletter.. I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I
>want to use to promote my website and mailing list ..
Not what you want to hear, but -even-if- 100
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I don't know why. If you have something like the following for your
> mailman router
>
> mailman_router:
> driver = accept
> domains = +mm_domains
> require_files = MAILMAN_HOME/lists/$local_part/config.pck
> local_part_suffix_optional
> local_part_s
Hi all,
i've been using mailman-2.1.9 about a year now without problems.
I've set up a new mail server (postfix) and installed mailman again.
I've succesfully created a new list called "mylist".
But, if i try to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] postfix replies that
this user does not exist:
Hello,
2008/1/24, Khalil Abbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Hello mailman guys..
>
> ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily
> newsletter.. I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want to
> use to promote my website and mailing list .. can I create anoth
Hello mailman guys..
ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily newsletter..
I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want to use to promote
my website and mailing list .. can I create another mailman installation and
add these addresses to it and use
Hello mailman guys..
ok, I have a dedicated server .. and I use mailman to send a daily newsletter..
I recenly got a list of 1,000,000 email addresses that I want to use to promote
my website and mailing list .. can I create another mailman installation and
add these addresses to it and use
20 matches
Mail list logo
