On 11/1/07, Mikael Hansen wrote:
> I like this because it does not artificially inflate the number of
> members on a list. But it is unfortunately very probable I would one
> night wake up bathed in sweat fearing that I may not have removed a
> corresponding whitelist entry at the time a given
On Nov 1, 2007, at 21:32, Mikael Hansen wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2007, at 20:40, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> whitelist = Privacy options...->Sender filters-
>>> accept_these_nonmembers
That's interesting. Your sentence was wrapped so that the greater
than sign came to begin the following line and as such
On Nov 1, 2007, at 20:40, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> whitelist = Privacy options...->Sender filters-
> >accept_these_nonmembers
I like this because it does not artificially inflate the number of
members on a list. But it is unfortunately very probable I would one
night wake up bathed in sweat fear
Brad Knowles wrote:
>
>In addition, an admin can also subscribe users and set them to be
>NOMAIL, or add an address to the whitelist.
whitelist = Privacy options...->Sender filters->accept_these_nonmembers
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay
Steven wrote:
>I just took those virtual mappings out of the /etc/mail/aliases file
>and re-ran newaliases. I tested via telnet and the message posted to
>the list! So, apparently my "listinquestion" aliases weren't in both
>aliases files originally.
There are two separate things.
Aliases of
On 11/1/07, Mikael Hansen wrote:
> I am sorry to ask such a basic question, but would it be possible for
> a list member (or the moderator or the list admin or the site admin)
> to create a user alias, defined as allowing a user's second email
> address to post to a list based on the membershi
I am sorry to ask such a basic question, but would it be possible for
a list member (or the moderator or the list admin or the site admin)
to create a user alias, defined as allowing a user's second email
address to post to a list based on the membership of that user's
primary email address
On 11/1/07, Steven ** wrote:
> Seems like my "[EMAIL PROTECTED] listinquestion" lines
> are not being parsed. Are those supposed to go in the aliases file?
> I'm thinking no. So, where should they be?
Yes, in the aliases file. However, you should have a colon after the
alias and before
Brad Knowles wrote:
>If you're going to implement any kind of anti-spam system, make sure
>to implement that only within your MTA (sendmail, postfix, Exim,
>whatever). Make sure that you don't ever accept a message and then try
>to bounce it --that's called "backscatter" and makes you as bad
I just took those virtual mappings out of the /etc/mail/aliases file
and re-ran newaliases. I tested via telnet and the message posted to
the list! So, apparently my "listinquestion" aliases weren't in both
aliases files originally.
-Steven
On 11/1/07, Steven ** <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upo
Ben O'Shea wrote:
>Ok, I'm across all that. The thing is, we have had a few users
>actually post messages to this list and I get a message saying the
>post requires moderator approval. I then go and approve the message,
>however each day I am notified about the same messages (i.e. ones I
>have "ap
On 11/1/07, Steven ** wrote:
> 3. $ cat /etc/aliases
[ ... deletia ... ]
> $ sudo newaliases
> WARNING: local host name (montgoss-server) is not qualified; see
> cf/README: WHO AM I?
> /etc/mail/aliases: 21 aliases, longest 52 bytes, 1218 bytes total
Note that these two file names
Upon further inspection, they are identical... now. I'm guessing
they weren't before. Because, now when I run newaliases, I get:
$ sudo newaliases
WARNING: local host name (montgoss-server) is not qualified; see
cf/README: WHO AM I?
/etc/mail/aliases: line 28: missing colon
/etc/mail/aliases: li
--On November 1, 2007 8:59:53 PM -0500 Steven **
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. $ cat /etc/aliases
> ## mailman mailing list
> mailman: "|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post mailman"
> mailman-admin:"|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman admin mailman"
> $ sudo newaliases
> WARNI
But those two files are identical.
-Steven
On 11/1/07, Steve Burling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On November 1, 2007 8:59:53 PM -0500 Steven **
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 3. $ cat /etc/aliases
> > ## mailman mailing list
> > mailman: "|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post ma
>From FAQ:
1. $ sudo check_perms
No problems found
2. $ ps auxww| grep mailmanctl |grep -v grep
list 5213 0.0 0.4 8696 4560 ?Ss Oct30 0:00
/usr/bin/python/usr/lib/mailman/bin/mailmanctl -s -q start
$ ps auxww | egrep 'p[y]thon'
list 5213 0.0 0.4 8696 4560 ?
Whatever you do, DON'T implement your anti-spam system inside of a
tool like procmail.
If you're going to implement any kind of anti-spam system, make sure
to implement that only within your MTA (sendmail, postfix, Exim,
whatever). Make sure that you don't ever accept a message and then try
We are planning to implement spam blocking as I found in some
postings on the net.
Presenty, when we create a new list it sends an email of the form
The mailing list `xyz' has been created via the through-the-web
interface. In order to complete the activation of this mailing list,
the
proper /
Hi
I have installed and configured mailman
One issue is still remaining please help me regarding ..
need some help how do settings related to web interface
my company url is www.google.com/a/oscpro.in
and my mail-Id is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and also my gmail-id is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web server is
19 matches
Mail list logo
