I have been running mailman on Fedora core 4 for some time but then it
stopped.
Now when I try and run:
/etc/init.d/mailman start
I get:
-bash: /etc/init.d/mailman: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /etc/init.d/mailmanctl start
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/etc/init.d
douglas repetto wrote:
>
>We've been getting many many strange mailman-bounces. It seems that
>somewhere the mailman-bounces address is mis-configured. It should be
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], but mail seems to be sent as
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note missing "u"). That's causing
>bounces to bounce all over the
Cornils, Karin wrote:
>
>In the packet trace, you see the Mailman send out the cookie in both the
>Firefox and IE versions, but on the return, you see the Cookie sent from
>Firefox, but don't see it sent back from IE (Please let me know if
>sending the tcp streams to you offline would be useful).
Thanks Mark, you're right about the cookie. I had tried different
workstations and IE 6 & 7 browser versions to no effect (even in Accept
All Cookies mode and setting the Mailman site as trusted). But when I
try it on Firefox and Safari, it works - the reauthentication problem
doesn't happen in ei
Yes, indeed it is probably larger than need be, but after
fighting with other approaches, I just did it brute force.
Probably my way of doing it shouldn't be included in a future
release, although the capability of using syslog would be
very useful here.
Thank you for your comments.
- Bri
Hello,
We've been getting many many strange mailman-bounces. It seems that
somewhere the mailman-bounces address is mis-configured. It should be
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but mail seems to be sent as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note missing "u"). That's causing
bounces to bounce all over the place...in our mail
Mark Sapiro wrote, On 7/19/07 11:08 AM:
> Datatude wrote:
>> Not a big issue right now because the 20 or so subscribers are likely to
>> simply keep all the emails anyhow. What I might do is maintain monthly
>> mboxes and just offer any subscribers added to the list in the future
>> mboxes for i
Datatude wrote:
>
>Not a big issue right now because the 20 or so subscribers are likely to
>simply keep all the emails anyhow. What I might do is maintain monthly
>mboxes and just offer any subscribers added to the list in the future
>mboxes for import into their email clients.
Pipermail alre
