On 7/15/07, Brandon Slaten wrote:
> Some additional information:
>
> The old server:
>
> Using Mailman version: 2.1.6
[ ... deletia ... ]
> The new server:
>
> Using Mailman version: 2.1.5
With regards to software in general, moving backward in the version
number scheme is problem
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>OK, so VERP is still the way to go, since the message-id is always
>different
Do you mean the SMTP id in the first Received: (from Mailman) header?
You can get the recipient from your MTA log using this, but the
Message-ID: header is normally unchanged from the incoming
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Brandon Slaten wrote:
>>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> Brandon Slaten wrote:
>
>>~mailman -> /usr/lib/mailman
>>
>>There is no lock, qfiles, or log directories there to look at to assess
>>items 6-8 in the link above.
>
>
>In redhat 2.1.5, they may be in /var/mailman
But OTOH, the
Dennis Carr wrote:
>OK, something I notice in my posts log is a message not entirely unlike
>the following:
>
>Jul 15 09:27:31 2007 (32571) post to list from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>size=5706, message-id=, 557 failures
>
>Now, as time progresses, that "failures" number counts down, and
>ultimately, th
Quoting Christopher X. Candreva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Dave Dewey wrote:
>
> > Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Wow, maybe I'm just lucky.
>
> Is your server on the AOL whitelist ?
Yep. I get very few complaints, 99% of them accidental, so for
me it's just a way to c
unsubscribe
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.
OK, something I notice in my posts log is a message not entirely unlike
the following:
Jul 15 09:27:31 2007 (32571) post to list from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
size=5706, message-id=, 557 failures
Now, as time progresses, that "failures" number counts down, and
ultimately, there is a "success" asociated
Brandon Slaten wrote:
>
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Brandon Slaten wrote:
>~mailman -> /usr/lib/mailman
>
>There is no lock, qfiles, or log directories there to look at to assess
>items 6-8 in the link above.
In redhat 2.1.5, they may be in /var/mailman
(see below)
>I did find the mentioned mailma
Some additional information:
The old server:
Using Mailman version: 2.1.6
Compiled from src.
SunOS 5.8 Generic_117350-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4
The new server:
Using Mailman version: 2.1.5
Installed from mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.5
Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 17:59:08 EDT 2007 i
Brandon Slaten wrote:
>
>I just moved our Mailman lists to a new server. Accessing the listinfo
>and admin pages works fine. After creating a new list mail sent to that
>list is delivered. However mail set to the old lists, the ones that
>were moved to this server, is not delivered.
What happe
* Dave Dewey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Do you use VERP to send out the mails? If you do that you can see who
> > the culprit is.
>
> VERP doesn't work any longer for these, as of a couple months ago.
Damn! My last TOS notification dates back quite some time...
> They now redact ALL information t
* Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 7/14/07, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
>
>> Simple - yes. Effective? Depends on what you are after. By doing it this
>> way you are not really different from AOL, are you? You punish many users
>> just because some other are thoughtless and lazy. When I offer s
12 matches
Mail list logo
