On 6/4/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Yes, I have tried all the suggestions provided earlier in FAQ 4.73 & 6.14.
Could you also trim your replies? Including several levels of
additional material from previous replies makes it very difficult to
tell who has said what, and where the new text is.
>
> ubject:
> Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: Server not connected
> From:
> Leonard Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:31:01 -0400
> To:
> mailman-users@python.org
>
> To:
> mailman-users@python.org
>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding:
> 7bit
> Precedence:
> list
> MIME-V
On 6/4/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Yes, I have stopped & restarted Mailman after each mm_cfg.py change and
> no, there are no anti-virus or other rejections with postfix.
> Additionally I am not running SELinux on this box.
I haven't checked the earlier messages in this thread -- I'm assuming
>
> On 5/29/07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> >/ Does anybody else use Postfix 2.4?
> /
> Actually, I'm pretty sure we are currently using it on the NTP Public
> Services Project pages at ntp.isc.org, which is the project I had
> gotten involved in years ago, prior to getting involved in Mailman.
> I
John Bell wrote:
>
>The post assumes that you have access to the command line.
I have updated the FAQ to indicate that beginning with Mailman 2.1.6,
you can edit the subscribeack.txt (welcome message) template via the
admin web interface.
Also, the stuff in the FAQ about config_list is not a req
In FAQ 3.11 it mentions how to do the following:
Features: Members join by filling in a form on your website (and replying to
the confirmation email). They will be sent a welcome message that does not
mention how to post to the list. They will receive your newsletters, with a
footer that gives
David R Bosso wrote:
>
>Rule 1 is (I thought) Match Return-Path:, only if it's not followed by
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] This should discard for any Return Path but my email
>address, did you modify it to match yours, or do I have the (?!...) syntax
>wrong?
My mistake. I didn't really look at the Ru
--On Friday, June 1, 2007 11:32 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David R Bosso wrote:
>> --On May 22, 2007 4:53:05 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> David R Bosso wrote:
I have 2 rules set up. For a given test message, Rule 1 does not
match, a
