Douglas Phillipson wrote:
>Installed on Debian Testing, mailman updates fail, causing other
>packages to fail to install with the following output, any help would be
>greatly appreciated...
>
>Doug P
>
>apt-get install mailman
>No updates are necessary.
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> F
Installed on Debian Testing, mailman updates fail, causing other
packages to fail to install with the following output, any help would be
greatly appreciated...
Doug P
apt-get install mailman
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
mailman is already the newest version.
0
Christopher Adams wrote:
>Thanks, Mark. That seemed too obvious. Doesn't setting
>generic_nonmember_action to accept result in a lot of spam to the
>Mailman site admin? How are others dealing with this?
First, let me say that if your listinfo overview page says "If you are
having trouble using t
David R Bosso wrote:
>
>Thanks for offering to help. Yes, I can go back and forth with consistent
>results.
Thanks for providing the info I asked for. I will definitely look into
this unless someone else solves it in the mean time, but I will not be
able to spend any time on it before next week
-- Christopher Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 23.
Mai 2007 11:39:48 -0700 regarding Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman aliases:
Thanks, Mark. That seemed too obvious. Doesn't setting
generic_nonmember_action to accept result in a lot of spam to the
Mailman site admin? How are
Thanks, Mark. That seemed too obvious. Doesn't setting
generic_nonmember_action to accept result in a lot of spam to the
Mailman site admin? How are others dealing with this?
On 5/22/07, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Adams wrote:
>
> >Thanks,Mark. That helps explaining the p
--On May 22, 2007 4:53:05 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David R Bosso wrote:
>>
>> I have 2 rules set up. For a given test message, Rule 1 does not match,
>> and Rule 2 does. If I have Rule 1 set to discard, and Rule 2 set to
>> Hold, the message is discarded. If I make the
On 5/21/07 4:54 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would argue that Eudora is much more at fault here
Eudora was also the primary source of resistance to the List-* headers, with
its interesting habit of displaying all headers except those in its list of
"boring" headers. Manipulat
