Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
>
>I ran cleanarch, yes, but all it did was to escape every single "From "
>line, which would make arch think there was only one message.
Then either the From line doesn't match the pattern
mailbox.UnixMailbox._fromlinepattern or it is not followed immediately
(with no
James Davis wrote:
>
>Thanks, that did the trick. I deleted the digest as it serves no purpose
>to the users of this list.
In that case, you could set Digest options->digestable to No to
guarantee this can't happen again (note that the shunting of valid
messages due to a bad digest.mbox message
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> If you just move digest.mbox aside and don't replace it, you'll lose a
> digest. even if you do fix and replace it, you may wind up with and
> 'out of sequence' digest.
Thanks, that did the trick. I deleted the digest as it serves no purpose
to the users of this list.
Thank
Hi All--
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
>> But I have one list for which I used archives from two previous
>> incarnations of the list, plus the current archive mbox, as input to
>> arch. I made sure that the previous archives were in mbox format and
>> that they contained only