Re: [Mailman-Users] Alternatives to having a list own itself

2007-02-22 Thread Brad Knowles
At 6:43 PM -0700 2/22/07, Kelly Jones wrote: > My question: what's the best way to handle a situation like this? Have > a list owned by itself or "effectively" owned by itself. What I've done in situations similar to this, is to make the listowner list itself owned by an alias that is directly

Re: [Mailman-Users] List email domain versus archive / web admin domain.

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Alan Gutierrez wrote: > >I tried using mod_proxy, but that meant that the mailman CGI was unable >to determine the hostname, and therefore, did not provide for listings >of hosted lists in /mailman/listinfo I really don't know what you're trying to do, but if you put VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = Of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Alternatives to having a list own itself

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Kelly Jones wrote: > >We tried to make sysops owned by itself, but ran into problems: a >spammer emailed sysops, and the mail was held for moderation. However, >the "sysops post requires approval" message came from sysops-bounces >and went to sysops: Mailman apparently detected a loop and didn't >d

[Mailman-Users] Alternatives to having a list own itself

2007-02-22 Thread Kelly Jones
I'm part of a group of people ("sysops") that own several lists. Because the group changes occasionally, we've created a Mailman list called "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and all of our lists are owned by "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". The sysops list also receives other (non-Mailman-generated) emails. We tried to m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Confirmation and sent messages not reaching end-user

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Jason Luck > >SMTPHOST...in mm_cfg.py...no info on > DELIVERY_MODULE = 'SMTPDirect' > MTA = 'Manual' > SMTPHOST = 'localhost' > SMTPPORT = 0 # default from smtplib > SENDMAIL_CMD = '/usr/lib/sendmail' If the above are actually indented, this is bad. They shouldn't b

[Mailman-Users] Confirmation and sent messages not reaching end-user

2007-02-22 Thread Jason Luck
- Mailman 2.1.7 - RPM - Redhat Fedora Linux version 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 - Sendmail Question: I'm setting up a Mailman system and have hit a roadblock that looks to deal with sending and receiving messages. What I know: I've looked through the FAQ and specfically FAQ 3.14, and am able to get a nu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Possible to forward bounces from mass invitation?

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Carter Braxton wrote: >I'm running mailman 2.1.5 on a Ubuntu 6.0.1 server, and am going to do >an initial mass invitation to the mailing list. Is there a way to have >any invitations that bounce be forwarded to the list owner? (If not the >bounces can always be culled from the postfix log, but it

Re: [Mailman-Users] retrieving usernames and passwords from mailman

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Matthew Clarkson wrote: >I'm building a simple document sharing application to run alongside >mailman. What I would like to do is use mailmans users/passwords for >this application. >Ultimately what I would like to do is pull out all usernames & >passwords and throw it all into a file for a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Making all bounces, even temporary ones, go to list owner

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Whitcomb, Jeff wrote: >In response to Mark's email number 9 below. I have always received >delayed messages as a list owner, and did not know that I am not >supposed to having the list configured as he mentions. I am not trying to say how anyone is 'supposed' to have her or his list set up in g

Re: [Mailman-Users] postfix virtual domain problem

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Patrick Bogen wrote: >On 2/21/07, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure I see: >> >> delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code -1:(111, Connection Refused) > >This seems to indicate that mailman can't talk to the SMTP server that >it's supposed to used to send m

Re: [Mailman-Users] List not archiving (was: Your message was rejected?!?)

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Baris Basar wrote: >Yes. It's on. in response to: >Is archiving turned on for the list? Was the post delivered to list members? Is there anything in Mailman's error log? Is ArchRunner Running? See -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL

Re: [Mailman-Users] Your message was rejected?!?

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
>On 2/22/07, Baris Basar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have posted an e-mail to a newly created list. And i want to look at list >> archieves. And i get this message. "No messages have been posted to this >> list yet, so the archives are currently empty." Is archiving turned on for the list? --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Your message was rejected?!?

2007-02-22 Thread Larry Stone
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Patrick Bogen wrote: > On 2/22/07, Baris Basar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have posted an e-mail to a newly created list. And i want to look at list > > archieves. And i get this message. "No messages have been posted to this > > list yet, so the archives are currently em

Re: [Mailman-Users] Your message was rejected?!?

2007-02-22 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 2/22/07, Baris Basar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have posted an e-mail to a newly created list. And i want to look at list > archieves. And i get this message. "No messages have been posted to this > list yet, so the archives are currently empty." And i wanna ask , what is > MTA? The MTA is t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moving mailman lists

2007-02-22 Thread Patrick Bogen
As far as I know, there's no 'one click' tool to move lists around, nor is there anything that will rewrite archives to change the old domain (that said, a simple sed script could do this, but possibly not reliably). See FAQ 3.4

Re: [Mailman-Users] postfix virtual domain problem

2007-02-22 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 2/21/07, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I have read the other threads and the setup procedure in the manual > and tried other suggested setups too. I see the list archives show up > yet no mail ever gets delivered. It always gets stopped on delivery. > In /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure I s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Your message was rejected?!?

2007-02-22 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 2/22/07, kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the email address the email is coming from is in the field: > "List of non-member addresses whose postings should be automatically > accepted." > > i just get: Your message was rejected. that's all. no explanation... > there is nothing in the