Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman not working after reboot

At 12:30 PM +0900 1/31/07, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > If you have Mailman questions, we should be able to help with those. > > But we can't provide support for OS-specific issues. > > However, members of this list often do; eg, this thread got 3 answers. Of which two were "We can't help yo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman not working after reboot

Brad Knowles writes: > If you have Mailman questions, we should be able to help with those. > But we can't provide support for OS-specific issues. However, members of this list often do; eg, this thread got 3 answers. How about starting an OS-specific section of the FAQ, similar to the MTA In

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix SOLVED

On 1/30/07 9:49 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > David Newman wrote: >> pctest: "|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post pctest" >> >> but virtual-mailman has: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] pctest >> >> I'm missing how to glue the two together, and this is NOT covered in the >> existing m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Shunting problem

Mark Sapiro wrote: >NFN Smith wrote: > >>2) What do I need to do to clear the problem that is causing shunting? > > >See 1). Note: if you meant what do you need to do to prevent this from happening again, upgrade to Mailman 2.1.7 or later. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway i

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moved list, archiving

At 3:33 PM -0800 1/30/07, G. Armour Van Horn wrote: > That sounds ugly, given that the mbox file is over 20 megs. I guess I'll > try cleanarch and ignore the rest of it, as I lack the skill (or > patience) to find and repair the errors in the mbox. But thanks for the > lead. Try doing this ki

Re: [Mailman-Users] Shunting problem

NFN Smith wrote: >I'm running Mailman 2.1.5 on a Debian 3.1 box. In the last few days, >I'm getting an increasing number of messages shunted, with error logs >that look like: > >> Jan 30 23:10:53 2007 (3315) Uncaught runner exception: decoding >Unicode is not supported >> Jan 30 23:10:53 2007 (33

[Mailman-Users] Shunting problem

I'm running Mailman 2.1.5 on a Debian 3.1 box. In the last few days, I'm getting an increasing number of messages shunted, with error logs that look like: > Jan 30 23:10:53 2007 (3315) Uncaught runner exception: decoding Unicode is not supported > Jan 30 23:10:53 2007 (3315) Traceback (most recen

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moved list, archiving

G. Armour Van Horn wrote: >I spoke too soon. I got a lot of this: > >#Unix-From line changed: 175609 > From the wire service copy: >###Unix-From line changed: 176324 > From the MM press release: >##Unix-From line changed: 178901 > From a designers view I think FW is the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moved list, archiving

Paul Tomblin wrote: >Quoting G. Armour Van Horn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >>After moving the list to it's new home and running the script to update >>the archive, I ended up with a raft of messages in the January 2007 >>archive that are probably ancient. They show no subject, and all of them >

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailing lists

Dan Good wrote: > >I am unable to access the web interfaces for this group. All others >work fine. This I get a login prompt but noting else. The list is probably locked, and the lock is almost certainly stale. See which I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moved list, archiving

Paul Tomblin wrote: >Quoting G. Armour Van Horn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >>After moving the list to it's new home and running the script to update >>the archive, I ended up with a raft of messages in the January 2007 >>archive that are probably ancient. They show no subject, and all of them >

[Mailman-Users] mailing lists

Hello, I am writing because I'm having some difficulty with a group within my mailing lists. I am unable to access the web interfaces for this group. All others work fine. This I get a login prompt but noting else. Any ideas on how to fix this? Thanks Dan --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't create a new list

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >When I use either www.mydomain.net or www.otherdomain.com to get to >mailman/create, and try to create the new list, every try returns me >Error: Unknown virtual host for attempts to create >under either domain. It appears that www.domain.ext is the domain set by you

[Mailman-Users] Can't create a new list

I'm trying to create a new list on a Mailman 2.1.9 installation. The list is set up at www.mydomain.net with virtual hosting of otherdomain.com. When I use either www.mydomain.net or www.otherdomain.com to get to mailman/create, and try to create the new list, every try returns me Error: Unknow

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

Paul Fox wrote: > >in that vein -- i never saw any yea or nay on the minor doc >addition i submitted on a related aspect of lists at virtual >domains. at the time i thought i might have sent the change to >the wrong place (i.e. the users', not the developers' list) but >now i'm just wondering if

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

mark wrote: > David Newman wrote: > > > Once I get this running I'd be glad to write up > > documentation and submit it for possible inclusion. > > I'm sure this can be improved. We'd appreciate the help. in that vein -- i never saw any yea or nay on the minor doc addition i submitted on a

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

Paul Fox wrote: >[ cc'ing the list on reply ] > >orlando wrote: > > I think he still has to issue the genaliases command. > >oh, yes. in addition, all of the hash maps need to have postmap >run on them. Assuming MTA = 'Postfix', genaliases and list creation/deletion will run the commands define

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

Paul Fox wrote: > >as i understand it, it's done automatically by postfix, if you >tell it about all the maps. if you weren't using mysql, the >definition of virtual_alias_maps should include the alias maps >for any virtual domains: > >virtual_alias_maps = > hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/vir

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

David Newman wrote: > >pctest: "|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post pctest" > >but virtual-mailman has: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] pctest > >I'm missing how to glue the two together, and this is NOT covered in the >existing mailman docs. Do you have the appropriate alias_map

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

[ cc'ing the list on reply ] orlando wrote: > I think he still has to issue the genaliases command. oh, yes. in addition, all of the hash maps need to have postmap run on them. paul > > the virtual_alias_map is the one that should have a mysql entry: > > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/usr

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

david wrote: > I've read and reread and reread the mailman docs, and I don't see where and > how > virtual addresses get piped to the command above. The file > /usr/local/mailman/data/aliases has commands like the above; the file > /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman does not. > > F

Re: [Mailman-Users] virtual domain setup with postfix

On Monday, January 29, 2007, at 04:18PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Basically, postfix delivers message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nothing happens >>after that. > > >Presumably, that's because Postfix is delivering the mail to a local >mailbox 'pctest' instead of piping it to Mai

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moved list, archiving

Quoting G. Armour Van Horn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > After moving the list to it's new home and running the script to update > the archive, I ended up with a raft of messages in the January 2007 > archive that are probably ancient. They show no subject, and all of them > are dated this afternoon, p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moved list, archiving

At 12:37 AM -0800 1/30/07, G. Armour Van Horn wrote: > After moving the list to it's new home and running the script to update > the archive, I ended up with a raft of messages in the January 2007 > archive that are probably ancient. They show no subject, and all of them > are dated this after

[Mailman-Users] Moved list, archiving

After moving the list to it's new home and running the script to update the archive, I ended up with a raft of messages in the January 2007 archive that are probably ancient. They show no subject, and all of them are dated this afternoon, probably at the time that I ran the script. Is there any