Greg Wilkinson wrote:
>
>I am a list administrator but I am not a member of the list. The list
>viewing option is set to all members. When I send the email command
>"who " to the list, it is rejected with the "You are not
>allowed to retrieve the list membership." error message. One would
>t
There are many messages on this topic, however I haven't found the
answer to my particular situation.
I am a list administrator but I am not a member of the list. The list
viewing option is set to all members. When I send the email command
"who " to the list, it is rejected with the "You are
Ron Brogden writes:
> The administrator gets a discard notice but there is no mention of
> specifically why the message was discarded. Is there any option anyone is
> aware of to make logging of discards more verbose?
Unlike the Hold exception, the Discard exception contains no
information
James Farren wrote:
>
>If not running under SuExec, how it is supposed to run on Name Based Virtual
>Host -apache2 based machine?
Since User and Group don't work in this environment, either configure
Mailman's CGI wrappers to expect the group that Apache runs them as
without SuExec, or follow som
Ron Brogden wrote:
>Hello. I have a list admin who is attempting to legitimately post to a
>Mailman list (version 2.1.9) but Mailman is discarding the message:
>
>Dec 18 12:42:42 2006 (168) Message discarded, msgid:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Is there any option anyone is
>aware of to make logging
Hello. I have a list admin who is attempting to legitimately post to a
Mailman list (version 2.1.9) but Mailman is discarding the message:
Dec 18 12:42:42 2006 (168) Message discarded, msgid:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here is the exim log showing the message arriving (domain changed of course):
200
On 12/15/06 6:45 PM, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:48 AM -0300 12/15/06, Andres Tarallo wrote:
>
>> We need to receive a notification that the suscribers had received the mail.
>> We where thinking in adding a header that makes the mail client return an
>> automatic answer.
James Farren wrote:
>
>Doesn't work. this is what I get.
>
>[2006-12-19 21:49:27]: uid: (72/mailman) gid: (67/67) cmd: admin
>[2006-12-19 21:49:27]: cannot run as forbidden uid (72/admin)
>
>
>I am out of clues...
I assume the above refers to:
>> > SuexecUserGroup domain domain
>>
>>
>> I think
At 11:27 AM -0800 12/19/06, Jim John wrote:
> But can mailman put the mail into the cyrus mailboxes?
No. Mailman is not a Local Delivery Agent. Only the Cyrus LDA can
put mail into the Cyrus mailboxes. You would configure postfix to
deliver mail for Mailman directly to Mailman, Mailman woul
But can mailman put the mail into the cyrus mailboxes?
We do not have postfix mailboxes. Or does it send the
mail back to postfix for delivery using another agent
such as cyrus?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protecti
Precisely Mr Hermann. As such, it has to be invoked
via mailertable (for an entire domain) or via aliases
for specific addresses.
--- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clement Hermann wrote:
> >
> >Do you use a specific mailer macro to execute
> mailman without using
> >aliases ? I do not
On 12/19/06, Jim John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello. We have configured postfix + cyrus + ldap, but
> would like to add mailman for mailing lists. Is that
> possible with out setup? All delivery is through the
> cyrus-tranport which puts mail in the cyrus mailbox.
> We are not sure how mailman
Hello. We have configured postfix + cyrus + ldap, but
would like to add mailman for mailing lists. Is that
possible with out setup? All delivery is through the
cyrus-tranport which puts mail in the cyrus mailbox.
We are not sure how mailman delivery would work in
this environment? Thanks.
Clement Hermann wrote:
>
>Do you use a specific mailer macro to execute mailman without using
>aliases ? I do not know the mm-handler you're talking about.
mm-handler is a script in the contrib/ directory of the distribution.
it is intended to be invoked by Sendmail to receive all mail addressed
Ralph Utbult wrote:
>
>My problem is partially solved - changed ID for data/aliases* to mail
>mail.
I assume you are saying that this allows mail delivery to Mailman to
work.
>It seems that the web interface is working (at least locally, on
>the mail server). I will try to access it from a wind
>> stupidmail4me a écrit :
> VIRTUSER_DOMAIN is not useless, it still gets run
> through virtusertable. You need a VIRTUSER_DOMAIN so
> that it runs through a mailer (which becomes the
> "local" mailer, in this case, mm-handler).
>
>
right, Though I usually use {W} for this purpose (the virtuse
James Farren wrote:
>---
>When accessing: http://domain.com/mailman/admin
>
>
>suexec.log:
>
>[2006-12-17 22:26:17]: uid: (500/domain) gid: (500/500) cmd: admin
>[2006-12-17 22:26:17]: command not in docroot
>(/usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin/admin)
>
>
>
>chown /usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin/:
>
>-rwxr-xr-x
Barry Finkel wrote:
>I am trying to decide whether to use the Debian/Ubuntu 2.1.5-9ubuntu4.1
>package or to use the 2.1.9 source for Mailman.
I would recommend installing from source, but I'm biased ...
>I see that Ubuntu
>comes with
>
> postfix-to-mailman.py
>
>a Postfix transport pipe.
I have a major problems executing mailman cgi's via web server.
I am getting very desperate right now since I don't see a solution to this
problem.
Is there a ways to make this work and what should I do?
---
When accessing: http://domain.com/mailman/admin
suexec.log:
[2006-12-17 22:26:17]: uid:
I am trying to decide whether to use the Debian/Ubuntu 2.1.5-9ubuntu4.1
package or to use the 2.1.9 source for Mailman. I see that Ubuntu
comes with
postfix-to-mailman.py
a Postfix transport pipe. I do not see this in the 2.1.9 source.
Is this transport pipe really needed?
Am I correct in
--- Clement Hermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stupidmail4me a écrit :
> > Here's the setup:
> > OpenBSD 4.0
> > Mailman 2.1.8p3
> >
> > I have in my mc file I have
> > VIRTUSER_DOMAIN(`lists.foo.org') set (and yes,
> I've
> > run m4 and made the cf file). In mailertable I've
> got
> > lists.fo
I'm using mm-handler from /contrib.
I checked and the aliases I do have work (root,
MAILER-DAEMON, etc). But on my other setup it accepts
any email address on that domain and let's mm-handler
handle it from there so I don't need aliases in the
aliases file.
Like I said, everything (sendmail's cf
> Mark Sapiro writes:
>
> > Then, the question is why doesn't bin/check_perms -f fix
> it? Are you > running this as root?
>
> This may have improved more recently, but sometimes I've had
> to run check_perms -f more than once.
Ran it a couple of times myself ;-)
My problem is partially sol
Mark Sapiro writes:
> Then, the question is why doesn't bin/check_perms -f fix it? Are you
> running this as root?
This may have improved more recently, but sometimes I've had to run
check_perms -f more than once.
--
Mailman-Users mailing lis
stupidmail4me a écrit :
> Here's the setup:
> OpenBSD 4.0
> Mailman 2.1.8p3
>
> I have in my mc file I have
> VIRTUSER_DOMAIN(`lists.foo.org') set (and yes, I've
> run m4 and made the cf file). In mailertable I've got
> lists.foo.org mailman:lists.foo.org. But if I try and
> send a message I get a
25 matches
Mail list logo
