Re: [Mailman-Users] Patch included in later builds?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Is there any plans on including the functionality of the patch in later builds >of Mailman? Perhaps 2.2.x? Yes, the patch at is a candidate for inclusion in Mailman 2.2. --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with having to authorize

Joseph Richardson (Mark R.?) wrote: >The one I set up works except for the fact that I have to authorize every >piece of mail that is sent. I have both set up with a calendar to send >reminders and that is the one that I don't want to have to authorize. Can >anyone help? When you go to the a

[Mailman-Users] Problems with having to authorize

Hope some one can help. I am taking care of two mailing list. I installed one, and a friend installed and set up the other. I have set all of the admin settings the same. The one my friend set up is working fine. The one I set up works except for the fact that I have to authorize every piece

[Mailman-Users] Patch included in later builds?

Thanks Mark! Is there any plans on including the functionality of the patch in later builds of Mailman? Perhaps 2.2.x? Brandon ---Original Message--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >Is this possible? In what ways is it possible? Can I make it so CHILD1 can >post to MAIN? Can I make it so that CHILD1 ca

Re: [Mailman-Users] is the arch utility missing in OSX server mailman installation?

At 5:46 PM -0800 12/12/06, Larry Dieterich wrote: > I found the FAQ's referenced, but they seem mostly for setup, which I > have successfully done. I just updated FAQ 1.21 to include the following text at the bottom: All other support issues relating to using the Apple-provided

Re: [Mailman-Users] is the arch utility missing in OSX servermailman installation?

Larry Dieterich wrote: > >Dan pointed me to the location for the scripts, which Apple has >placed in /usr/share/mailman/Mailman/ >There is a directory there called Archiver. I assume that this is the >tool I need but I am stumped about how to make it rebuild the archive >from the .mbox file whic

Re: [Mailman-Users] is the arch utility missing in OSX server mailman installation?

Thanks for the help. I am using the Apple-provided Mailman pre-installed on Tiger Server. 10.4.8 Build 8L127 I found the FAQ's referenced, but they seem mostly for setup, which I have successfully done. My problem is with the archive reconstruction. Dan pointed me to the location for the scri

Re: [Mailman-Users] is the arch utility missing in OSX server mailman installation?

At 4:34 PM -0800 12/12/06, Larry Dieterich wrote: > I successfully set up a Mailman list using the installation on OSX > Tiger Server. Are you using the built-in Apple-provided version of Mailman? If so, then please see the FAQ Wizard entry at

Re: [Mailman-Users] is the arch utility missing in OSX server mailman installation?

Larry Dieterich wrote: > I successfully set up a Mailman list using the installation on OSX > Tiger Server. > > When I tried to run the arch util to rebuild the html archive from > the edited .mbox, the arch command gives no joy. Arch returns the > architecture of the Mac hosting the list. ppc,

[Mailman-Users] is the arch utility missing in OSX server mailman installation?

Hi there. New to this list and new to Mailman. I successfully set up a Mailman list using the installation on OSX Tiger Server. Very cool software. A longtime majordomo user, I am impressed with Mailman. I wanted to edit the archives and was able to edit the listname.mbox file to remove the s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Umbrella List question

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >Is this possible? In what ways is it possible? Can I make it so CHILD1 can >post to MAIN? Can I make it so that CHILD1 can post to CHILD2? You need the patch at . -- Mark Sapiro <[

[Mailman-Users] Umbrella List question

Hi everybody, I'm new to managing Mailman lists, so please forgive my ignorance. :) I have an umbrella list with 4 lists that its serving. Let's call the main list MAIN, and the child lists CHILD1-CHILD4. My problem comes in the form of permissions. I want members of CHILD1 to be able to pos

Re: [Mailman-Users] removing members with non-standard characters

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >Try this one > > bin/list_members -i listname | bin/remove_members -f - -n listname > >If that doesn't work, see >or for a link to an >experimental withlist script that should do it. BTW, pl

Re: [Mailman-Users] removing members with non-standard characters

Anne Ramey wrote: > >Mark Sapiro wrote: >> If the bad addresses don't appear in list_members (I don't know why >> they wouldn't, but maybe they just appear with the control characters >> that you don't see and thus look OK) you can do >> >> bin/list_members listname | bin/synch_members -f - -n l

Re: [Mailman-Users] removing members with non-standard characters

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Anne Ramey wrote: > >> I should have mentioned that will not work for this case. You'll notice >> that these are not all nice ascii characters. some are spaces, some >> deletes, some other hex values...I don't know what they all are because >> they will not copy and p