Re: [Mailman-Users] Turning off unsubscription confirmation

2006-12-11 Thread deepali
This explains why your patch didn't work for me! I was trying to turn off the "your email command was successful" emails that get sent back when the user subscribes to a listserve. From what you've said below, the patch addresses some other issue. Thanks for your time, - Deepali On Dec 1

Re: [Mailman-Users] conversion (from Listproc)

2006-12-11 Thread Rob Dewhirst
On Dec 7, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Melinda wrote: > >> I could use some pointers in my conversion from Listproc to Mailman. > This question is so broad as to be almost beyond the scope of this > list. I'll just say a few things. > > List archives need to be exported as a flat file

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pipelining with Mailman?

2006-12-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I have a question regarding pipelining, etc. If my mailing list has 600 >subscribers from domain.com, will Mailman combined with my MTA (Postfix) >pipeline all of these messages that are destined to the same domain? Maybe. >From >what I understand, it will do this

[Mailman-Users] Pipelining with Mailman?

2006-12-11 Thread matt
Hi all, I am in the process of converting an old script that reads thru a text file and sends an email to a few thousand people (this is a legit business opt-in newsletter). I have a question regarding pipelining, etc. If my mailing list has 600 subscribers from domain.com, will Mailman combined

Re: [Mailman-Users] Turning off unsubscription confirmation

2006-12-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ben Swihart wrote: > >My problem is resolved, as far as this particular use of mailman. >However, if you set mailman to show the None option and select it, that >appears to cause the e-mail command results bug. Aaahh - the light dawns. I didn't realize the 'command results' email was in respon

Re: [Mailman-Users] Turning off unsubscription confirmation

2006-12-11 Thread Dragon
Ben Swihart sent the message below at 14:25 12/11/2006: >Sorry if I confused you. Allow me to clarify. First, I am using >version 2.1.9.cp1, which I don't think I have mentioned so far. > >What I really wanted was to turn off unsubscription confirmations, as we >don't feel there is a threat of ma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Turning off unsubscription confirmation

2006-12-11 Thread Ben Swihart
Sorry if I confused you. Allow me to clarify. First, I am using version 2.1.9.cp1, which I don't think I have mentioned so far. What I really wanted was to turn off unsubscription confirmations, as we don't feel there is a threat of malicious "spoof" unsubscribes on this particularly benign l

Re: [Mailman-Users] Turning off unsubscription confirmation

2006-12-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ben Swihart wrote: > >Because we are unable to stop mailman from delivering e-mail command >results to our subscribers, we have gone back to a confirmation system >whereby an e-mail is sent to users when a subscription request is made. Now I'm really confused. I thought that what was happening

Re: [Mailman-Users] Turning off unsubscription confirmation

2006-12-11 Thread Dave Foran
There is an option in the unscribe page that toggles those 2 options on or off http://someuseslessdomain/mailman/admin/xxx//members/remove x== list name Dave > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Ben Swihart > Sent: Monday, Dec

[Mailman-Users] Turning off unsubscription confirmation

2006-12-11 Thread Ben Swihart
Hello, Because we are unable to stop mailman from delivering e-mail command results to our subscribers, we have gone back to a confirmation system whereby an e-mail is sent to users when a subscription request is made. However, we feel that unsubscription confirmation is uncessary and the uns

Re: [Mailman-Users] Filtering on subject prefix

2006-12-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Gordon Moyer wrote: >I am running mailman 2.1.9 and I'd like to auto discard list emails >with a subject prefix of "***SPAM***" (this is being done by >spamasassin). I've been looking for rule documentation, and haven't >been able to find any. > >Can anyone tell me what the rule would look like t