At 9:45 AM +1100 12/1/06, Saxvik, Ben wrote:
> I verified that sendmail was running and it was. I then proceeded to
> /etc/hosts file and found that the loopback address for the machine was
> incorrect. Instead of the address being 127.0.0.1 it was ::1. Once I
> change it back it was all sweet
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 09:27 pm, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> >When creating a new list, (my first list) I get:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] thomas]# newlist
> >Create a new, unpopulated mailing list.
> >.
> >.
> >.
> >Note that listnames are forced to lowercase.
> >
> >Unknown langu
We have a list running 30,000+ list members.
Recently we have sent out several mails to this list, and it's still
running.
However, we can't login to the admin webpage. After we input password,
the page was loading as shown in the status bar, but after several
minutes still can't show the admi
SpamDetect should be the first handler in the pipeline, which means
that header_filter_rules should be one of the first things checked. I
do not know what is causing your issue.
What does the vette log have to say about these messages?
Please keep all replies on-list.
- Patrick Bogen
On 11/30/0
I have been searching everywhere for like some sort of tutorial on how to
set this up. The manual is very vague on how to handle virtual domains.
I have mailman set up in /home/mailman
In /home/mailman I have 3 directories (1 for each of my virtual hosts)
When I went to install mailma
Hi,
mailman-2.1.9
installed from source in chroot
slackware 2.4.32
sendmail 8.13.5 (not chrooted)
I also have a version installed out of chroot, and if I create or
modify a list from command prompt, I get the confirmation email
correctly (email telling you that the list was created with passwd,
I send email to the list using my corprate Outlook client to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what setting do i have in error that logs [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead [EMAIL
PROTECTED] I dont have a mail client on the list server at all. Strickly
command line shell only.
The place I am looking is in the ma
Hi Patrick,
I tired to telnet to port 25 on localhost and got a connection refused
error.
I verified that sendmail was running and it was. I then proceeded to
/etc/hosts file and found that the loopback address for the machine was
incorrect. Instead of the address being 127.0.0.1 it was ::1. Once
On 11/30/06, Duane Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ^subject:.*hi\sit
> ^subject:.*wrote:
> But they don't seem to work. I am not very familiar with regular
> expressions. Can someone point out something I am doing wrong?
These look fine to me. What do you have the action set to for these rules?
On 11/30/06, Richard Kirkcaldy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to log the creation of new lists? We've got quite a
> few people administering our Mailman server and I'd like announcements
> of new lists to be either logged somewhere or, even better, emailed
> out to the Mailman list.
On 11/30/06, Ken Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do have access to the box that mailman is on. The vette log shows:
>
> Nov 29 08:05:02 2006 (11992) Mailman post from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> held,
> message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Post by non-member to a members-only list
The address '[EMAIL PR
Hi,
Is there a way to log the creation of new lists? We've got quite a
few people administering our Mailman server and I'd like announcements
of new lists to be either logged somewhere or, even better, emailed
out to the Mailman list.
--
Richard Kirkcaldy
First let me say that I realize that filtering is supposedly better done
at the MTA level (and we are running spam assassin), but I don't have
access to that level; I am only a moderator for several lists, and I
would like to be able to do simple filtering without bothering the sys
admin.
With
I do have access to the box that mailman is on. The vette log shows:
Nov 29 08:05:02 2006 (11992) Mailman post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] held,
message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Post by non-member to a members-only list
but the email address I sent to this list from is a member of the list. Is
this
Lonnie Norton skrev:
> Hi,
Hi Lonnie,
> There is a "umbrella_list" setting in the "General Options" for my
> lists but I'm not sure how I'm supposed to setup the umbrella list to
> allow posting from people who are on the sub lists. Has someone written an
> explanation of this procedure?
I ju
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Patrick Bogen wrote:
>> Is it possible within Mailman 2.1.9 to limit the number of emails sent to
>> an MTA responsible for delivery so that not all of them are passed on one
>> connection?
>
> Yes, set SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION and/or SMTP_MAX_RCPTS in
> your m
It reportedly applies properly to 2.1.8.. I don't know if anyone's
tried it against 2.1.9. If you're worried, just make a backup of
everything before you patch it.
- Patrick Bogen
P.s., please keep all replies on-list
On 11/30/06, Todd Seeleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I look
On 11/30/06, Lonnie Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> There is a "umbrella_list" setting in the "General Options" for my
> lists but I'm not sure how I'm supposed to setup the umbrella list to
> allow posting from people who are on the sub lists. Has someone written an
> explanation of
On 11/30/06, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible within Mailman 2.1.9 to limit the number of emails sent to
> an MTA responsible for delivery so that not all of them are passed on one
> connection?
Yes, set SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION and/or SMTP_MAX_RCPTS in
your mm_
On 11/30/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Dominika Tkaczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My second question is: does Mailman use any email authorization or it simply
> > checks the From: header of messages?
> Mailman only checks the From header, but it also looks for a s
On 11/30/06, Dominika Tkaczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like my mailing list to have the following configuration: the
> messages from most of subscribers are rejected, and there are a few
> subscribers whose messages are hold for moderation. Is there any way to do
> so without changing t
On 11/30/06, Saxvik, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes the MTA is running on the mailman machine.
>
> No I have not changed the options SMTPHOST and SMTPPORT, they are still
> set to their default settings. SMTPHOST 'localhost' SMTPPORT '0'.
Can you double-check that your MTA is listening on po
Hello,
I would like my mailing list to have the following configuration: the
messages from most of subscribers are rejected, and there are a few
subscribers whose messages are hold for moderation. Is there any way to do
so without changing the source code? Or maybe there are already some
patc
Hello,
Is it possible within Mailman 2.1.9 to limit the number of emails sent to
an MTA responsible for delivery so that not all of them are passed on one
connection? I have a mls with about 600 addresses and the list is set to
full personalization (monthly anounce list). When I ran it for the
24 matches
Mail list logo
