-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 19, 2006, at 12:41 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> If you haven't started rebuilding the archives yet, I suggest you
> don't
> do it. Not only will it invalidate all the links in the FAQ which can
> be changed with some effort, it will also invalida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 19, 2006, at 4:00 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> This might very well work. But speaking only for myself, I would
> not be interested in being on the mailman-help list.
I don't blame you ;). If anybody else is interested in seeing a
mailman-h
> "Brad" == Brad Knowles
> "Re: [Mailman-Users] Difficulties with mailman 2.1.5"
> Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:52:50 -0600
Brad> What really needs to happen is the Debian guys need to get
Brad> 2.1.9 and "Debian-ize" that codebase, and then ship that out
Brad> to all their custome
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:00:49PM -0800, Dragon wrote:
>
. . . .
> >your INBOX. I see a fair number of complaints on one of the mailing
> >lists I subscribe to that has a lot of gmail users on it about gmail's
> >general disregard for the existence of mailing lists and the whole
> >
Alan McConnell wrote:
> Let me add my humble voice to endorse Mr Mahesh's ideas. I'd
> like to be able to approve/disapprove member joining, and
> unknown people posting, as well.
You can currently approve/discard held posts by email. If
admin_immed_notify is Yes, the notific
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:01:50AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> BG Mahesh wrote:
> >
> >We are using Mailman 2.1.9. I want the admin of the list to be able to do
> >the following by sending emails and not visiting the admin section (web)
> >
> >- Add/delete member(s)
> >- Delete "all" members of the
BG Mahesh wrote:
>
>We are using Mailman 2.1.9. I want the admin of the list to be able to do
>the following by sending emails and not visiting the admin section (web)
>
>- Add/delete member(s)
>- Delete "all" members of the list
>- Add a bunch of users to the list
This is something that would ha
Brad Knowles wrote:
>
>I took another look at this page, it looks like we should be able to
>update the links by editing the templates from which the HTML files
>are built. I've done that, and I'm in the process of completely
>re-generating the entire archive for mailman-users going back to the
At 2:44 AM -0600 11/19/06, Brad Knowles wrote:
>> And sure you link to the searchable mail archive from the faq and
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users, but not from
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/ (which is the first
>> place if I look for the searc
At 8:57 AM -0500 11/18/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Would this work for us? The Python community is much larger than the
> Mailman community, so has a larger pool of volunteers to draw from.
> A competing concern is that our Mailman experts like Mark, Brad, and
> everyone else here on mailman-us
At 8:20 AM -0500 11/18/06, Alan McConnell wrote:
> Now here is an "ignoramus" question, from one who knoweth not Python:
> If mailman is "powered by Python", why is not an upgrade from mailman
> 2.1.5 to, say, 2.1.9, accomplished by simply grabbin the new python
> scripts(hey, they are simply
At 1:48 PM +0100 11/18/06, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> (the take, take, take and leaching arguments are IMO a bit far fetched.
Basically, it comes down to a matter of trust. The Gmane folks say
that they operate by certain rules, and then we have multiple
instances where they fail to operate by t
12 matches
Mail list logo
